Very obviously you do seem to. Why allow just one company to corner that market? Why not open it up to healthy competition and work to make the product a bit more affordable as a result instead of only considering just how much money a single company can charge for that product? This country was built on competition but is drowning in greed.
That's what patent laws are all about. If a company develops a product, then the rights to the intellectual property are protected by law. That's true of ANY product that is produced and sold here in the U.S. Without the patent protection, nobody would spend the time and resources to develop new products in the first place.
The protection of patents and copyrights is one of the powers of Congress explicitly documented in the U.S. Constitution. I see no "right to affordable prescription drugs" written anywhere in the Constitution.
These discussions remind of the idiocy we see in my own state as a result of the "anti-gouging" laws that were passed in the aftermath of some major disruptive weather events in recent years.
The state passed a law that prohibits a retail establishment from raising their prices more than some nominal amount during a state of emergency. This was done in response to the "outrageous" scenario a few years ago where gas stations raised their prices from $2.50/gallon to $4+ per gallon after a hurricane.
So now we have the natural result of this kind of nanny-state meddling. In the immediate aftermath of a typical winter storm here you can venture out onto the roads and be thankful that gas only costs $2.50/gallon. But the owners of the gas stations don't even bother opening for business until a day later anyway when the roads are clear and conditions are back to normal.
So the $2.50/gallon gasoline may as well cost $2 million per gallon ... since there isn't any available for motorists anyway.