Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nathanbedford
I'm confused. I think I need a good stiff drink to understand this. I'll then read it SLOWLY once more.

I know from the past that you are brilliant, but unfortunately, I am not.

;-)

14 posted on 01/03/2020 8:34:56 AM PST by a little elbow grease (... to err is human, to admit it divine ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: a little elbow grease
The failing is mine not yours.

It is essential to get a dismissal on merit not on procedure to demonstrate that even with a quid pro quo there is no case to be made. That is, the president cannot have committed an impeachable offense by inquiring into corruption even though that inquiry might benefit him personally as a future candidate.

So, assume that the presidents inquiry was motivated to advance his political campaign against a presumed opponent, Joe Biden. That is not an impeachable offense so long as the president had a plausible reason to initiate investigation of corruption. To hold otherwise would be to handcuff every president and to shield every corruption of potential candidates.

Thus the Senate stops the whole inquiry by a finding on the merits that there is no conceivable impeachable offense. It is necessary to stop the inquiry to take that probe away from the Democrats when we all know it will be amplified by the media.


15 posted on 01/03/2020 8:47:42 AM PST by nathanbedford (attack, repeat, attack! Bull Halsey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson