Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/15/2020 2:29:50 AM PST by knighthawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
To: knighthawk

What’s this business about a simple majority vote can keep him from being able to run in 2020?

There’s 3 or 4 Rs that are incredibly wobbly.

I hope they’ve been told terrible fortune will come their way if they did such a thing.


2 posted on 01/15/2020 2:33:25 AM PST by dp0622 (Radicals, racists Don't point fingers at me I'm a small town white boy Just tryin' to make ends meet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
I like this approach, since I have believed all along that the witnesses for the defense would be far more damaging to the Democrats than the prosecution witnesses would be to Trump.

Having said that, I would also say that the GOP should adamantly refuse to allow any prosecution witnesses who have not already testified in the House impeachment proceedings. Allowing this would open the door for an endless parade of assholes whose only role is to be a tool in a political hit job carried out by the Democrats with their media partners.

3 posted on 01/15/2020 2:36:06 AM PST by Alberta's Child (In the time of chimpanzees I was a monkey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

This is such a cowardly approach to this whole trial process. The GOP should be calling the ‘witnesses’ they want without concern for Democrats or whatever howling the media will do. Reciprocity? Give me a damn break! If this is the case, then the Pelosi gambit worked! The House effectively manipulated the Senate into doing its bidding, even though they have no claim in the Senate process. Weak cowards, the R’s.


13 posted on 01/15/2020 2:52:43 AM PST by KobraKai
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

A “trial” is not based on reciprocity!
Assuming we get to a stage were witnesses can be called / “evidence” introduced (beyond the house record) - there can and SHOULD not be any reason to limit what defense witnesses President Trump is allowed to call / evidence he can present (assuming relevance). IOW if the managers call Bolton, that does not mean that Trump gets ONE witness - he must be allowed any and all that he can muster to clear his name / dispute the manager’s claims.


15 posted on 01/15/2020 2:58:42 AM PST by An.American.Expatriate (Here's my strategy on the War against Terrorism: We win, they lose. - with apologies to R.R.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

That is BS the president is the defendant and should be able to call whoever he needs to defend himself.


17 posted on 01/15/2020 3:03:44 AM PST by WHBates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Tell the House that the House needs to call any witness they want to hear from...ie reopen impeachment in the House and do it right.

They did not subpoena witnesses [enforceably] in the House bc it would have given PT the right to x examine and call his own witnesses.

No prosecution witnesses in Senate unless they testified in the House! Allowing new senate witnesses changes the need for any witnesses at all in the House


18 posted on 01/15/2020 3:06:20 AM PST by Principled (No one will conquer America, from within or without, until its citizenry are disarmed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

L8r


20 posted on 01/15/2020 3:14:14 AM PST by preacher ( Journalism no longer reports news, they use news to shape our society.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Geez, now everyone is worried about fairness. Give me a break. Bad vibes are oozing out.


22 posted on 01/15/2020 3:17:50 AM PST by iontheball
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
Ted Cruz is back to being a weasel. What is it about the GOP that prevents them from standing together to defeat an anti-Amkerican enemy like the Rats?
24 posted on 01/15/2020 3:30:24 AM PST by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Cruz can’t resist, his inner weasel always comes out when it gets down to the short strokes.


25 posted on 01/15/2020 3:46:55 AM PST by Rashputin (Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
I like the idea but there has to be a mechanism so that this will not be drawn out for benefit of the rats.

Maybe something like, 2 days each side to call witnesses and then 16 hours to wrap up closing.

27 posted on 01/15/2020 3:51:40 AM PST by eartick (Stupidity is expecting the government that broke itself to go out and fix itself. Texan for TEXIT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

I have a better idea:

Dems may call ONLY those witnesses who have testified in the House, with the President’s team having full right to cross-examine them under oath.

The President may then call an UNLIMITED number of witnesses to refute the charges.


41 posted on 01/15/2020 4:53:57 AM PST by PapaBear3625 ("Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities." -- Voltaire)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

No deals with the traitorous Demonicrats!!!


43 posted on 01/15/2020 4:59:44 AM PST by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Why is this even an issue? Dems complain that if theiywitnesses aren’t allowed, it is a coverup. Well, if the President can’t call his witnesses, it is a farce.


47 posted on 01/15/2020 5:23:42 AM PST by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners. And to the NSA trolls, FU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

“if President Trump is removed from office”

Not a good plan.


48 posted on 01/15/2020 5:25:48 AM PST by Leep (Everyday is Trump Day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

“Likely candidates to be subpoenaed by the GOP include former Vice President Joe Biden, his son Hunter Biden, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam Schiff and the unidentified whistleblower who reported a July phone call between President Trump and the leader of Ukraine.”

I would call Hillary Clinton, Comey, Strozk, Paige, Brennan, Clapper, Nadler, Schiff, Pelosi, Mueller, Obama and everyone else who was involved in the coup against Trump.

And I would have the FBI on site ready to arrest anyone of them who lies under oath.


51 posted on 01/15/2020 5:45:26 AM PST by EQAndyBuzz (Operation Chaos is in play. Repeat, Operation Chaos is in play)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

many times I wonder who’s side Ted is on. (other than his own)


55 posted on 01/15/2020 5:55:39 AM PST by b4me (God Bless the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

I humbly suggest the following:

Every single Patriot who is invested in MAGA and cares about the future of the country much contact Rob Portman TODAY with the following message:

“If you refuse to vote for a summary dismissal, I am prepared to EMPTY MY WALLET in support of your primary opponent”.


56 posted on 01/15/2020 5:57:47 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog (Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk
Potential witnesses are the thug's children:

Paul Pelosi
Hunter Biden
Chelsea Clinton

As the thugs flash their shiny object, their children accept bribes.

59 posted on 01/15/2020 6:10:42 AM PST by TheNext (I Am Therefore I Think)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: knighthawk

Cruz is thinking strategically but he may be ignorant that normal people, especially women (even ones who hate the President), hate the impeachment follies and anyone who is seen to perpetuate it for one milisecond longer is an instant loser!


69 posted on 01/15/2020 7:21:33 AM PST by Theophilus (Ich bin ein Hong Konger)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson