Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lakeside Granny

Makes sense. I found conflicting info.


294 posted on 01/25/2020 8:37:37 AM PST by olesigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies ]


To: olesigh

Philbin doing a good job explaining that a Pelosi press conference is not enough to invoke the power of the House to issue subpoenas. The House vote took place Oct 31. The Pelosi press conference was September 24th.

Also describes the exchange between Nadler and WH on the subject of POTUS being able to participate in the impeachment inquiry.

Pelosi announced on Dec 5 that she was ordering Nadler to draft articles, The conclusion was done. The outcome was determined? There was no plan for further fact witnesses. Why participate? This is not “due process.”

Good job so far. House manangers cherry picked their own evidence to mislead, and then used mind reading. The investigation process was a sham. There was no due process. Why would you have a process like that? (GREAT QUESTION!)

Shift gears to “the whistleblower” Woot! ICIG Atkinson said whistleblower had political bias. That transcript is still secret.


335 posted on 01/25/2020 8:47:51 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 294 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson