White children ‘don’t deserve innocence’: CNN guest pushes pounding shame into kids at a young age

BizPac Review ^ | June 6, 2020 | Frieda Powers

[kevcol]

CNN was slammed for allowing airtime to an “anti-racism” activist who declared that white children “don’t deserve innocence.”

Activist and author Tim Wise gave a bigoted lesson to CNN viewers this week on the guilt of “white privilege” and how white parents can properly be an ally of “anti-racists.”

...

“One of my children’s teachers sent all parents a letter yesterday. And it was a link to this article,” co-host Poppy Harlow said on “CNN Newsroom,” referring to an article about discussing white privilege with the young. “When should parents do this with their kids and how?”

“Well you know, we started doing it when our kids were like six, I’m sure they hated me at the time for trying to talk about white privilege when they were trying to watch a Disney film,” Wise replied.

[aquila48]

Bookmark

[Vaduz]

Norman Bates brother?

[LibertarianLiz]

Okay, so he is an “anti-racist” activist, yet the first thing out of his mouth is pure racism.

[xander]

Their words mean nothing unless they immediately stop using the inventions of white people.

[Texas resident]

If they come near my kids, they will get messed up.

I am a fan of medieval weapons.

[pepsi_junkie]

Hey soccer moms who didn’t vote for Trump in 2016 or the GOP in 2018 because you thought Trump’s tweets were mean... you brought this on for your kids. It’s not too late to get over your emotional outlash against trump for being a meanie and actually consider what the other side really wants.

[yesthatjallen]

Tim Wise slithers out from under his slimy rock every few years to lecture white folk about their racism.

[yesthatjallen]

Probably the only gig he could find.

It is his only gig.

He makes his money doing race lectures to anyone who pays him.

Floyd gives him an opportunity to reintroduce himself to the gullible masses who love to listen to a white man denounce white racism.

He just ensured his lecture calendar will be fully booked for the next 5 years.

[daniel1212]

To impute guilt to a class of people on the basis of a condition (the tone of their skin) they had no choice over, because of something they had no responsibility for (mistreatment of others past generations of that class, is itself racism. But if you want to impute guilt due to benefits afforded by something they had no choice over, then that transcends races. Those athletes who engage in the above racial slander can be charged as guilty since they were born with DNA that enabled them to have notoriety. Likewise other aspects (most likely Obama would not have been elected if he had a squeaky voice).

Instead, while it is true that in both the spiritual and temporal realm souls differ in the amount and manner of grace they have been given, (Romans 12:5; 1 Corinthians 7:7; Exodus 4:11) and "unto whomsoever much is given, of him shall be much required: and to whom men have committed much, of him they will ask the more," (Luke 12:48) yet no one is to be charged with guilt over what their ancestors did based upon skin color. . (Deuteronomy 24:16; cf. 2Ki 14:5,6; 2Ch 25:4; Jer 31:29,30; Eze 18:20)

[Liberty Ship]

I think I found his son and daughter:

https://youtu.be/W7ZRAFd96uM