Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BBC Breaking News @BBCBreaking · 24s President Trump must turn over financial information to prosecutors but not to lawmakers, US Supreme Court says
BBC ^

Posted on 07/09/2020 7:40:20 AM PDT by janetjanet998

The US Supreme Court has ruled that President Trump must release his financial records so that they can be examined by prosecutors in New York.

In a related case, the court ruled Mr Trump did not have to share this information with Congress.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: scotus; trumptaxrecords
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last
So is this correct?

Congress can't have them?

1 posted on 07/09/2020 7:40:20 AM PDT by janetjanet998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998

If the Lib prosecutor has them. The MSM will have them and everyone else including Congress.


2 posted on 07/09/2020 7:41:39 AM PDT by Perseverando (Liberals, Progressives, Islamonazis, Statists, Commies, DemoKKKrats: It's a Godlessness disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998

‘Rat Leakers gonna leak.


3 posted on 07/09/2020 7:41:52 AM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998

Mueller round two.


4 posted on 07/09/2020 7:41:59 AM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death cults.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998

And since they can’t indict him while in office.....

Todays ruling means nothing until he leaves office?


5 posted on 07/09/2020 7:43:19 AM PDT by janetjanet998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998

Bloomberg:

“The U.S. Supreme Court cleared a New York grand jury to get President Donald Trump’s financial records while blocking for now House subpoenas that might have led to their public release before the election.”


6 posted on 07/09/2020 7:43:53 AM PDT by SpeedyInTexas (Localization, not Globalization)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998
The first case is returned to lower court where Trump can advance further arguments.

The second case is a pure Trump win, Congress loses.

7 posted on 07/09/2020 7:44:20 AM PDT by G Larry (There is no merit in compromising with the Devil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998
Not so fast.

According to scotusblog the case is sent back to the lower courts for more proceedings.

There is an excellent chance DJT's lawyers can run out the clock before the election.

8 posted on 07/09/2020 7:45:15 AM PDT by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998

Boy,the termites are busy. Time to tent the house.


9 posted on 07/09/2020 7:46:03 AM PDT by HighSierra5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perseverando

“If the Lib prosecutor has them. The MSM will have them and everyone else including Congress.”

A copy will be sent to everyone in the US once a lib gets his or her paws on them.


10 posted on 07/09/2020 7:46:07 AM PDT by brownsfan (Behold, the power of government cheese.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; AZ .44 MAG; Baynative; bgill; ...

p


11 posted on 07/09/2020 7:47:11 AM PDT by bitt (Let justice be done though the heavens fall Fiat justitia ruat cælum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G Larry

Nice clear explanation...thanks!


12 posted on 07/09/2020 7:47:12 AM PDT by sanjuanbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SpeedyInTexas

Fake News...The Court remanded the case back to the lower courts. They did not clear a NY grand jury to get the records.


13 posted on 07/09/2020 7:47:29 AM PDT by Russ (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998

> And since they can’t indict him while in office..... <

As I understand it, that is only by custom. There really is no law that would prevent such a thing.


14 posted on 07/09/2020 7:48:56 AM PDT by Leaning Right (I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998
That'll piss off Nadler. He was looking forward to eating the testimony along with his "Hungry Man" breakfast


15 posted on 07/09/2020 7:49:18 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (Hillary Clinton: Just like Joe with only half the dementia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998

Difference without distinction. If the New York prosecutor that is merely targeting him because of New Year’s get them, the Democrat party gets them. Robert screwed us again


16 posted on 07/09/2020 7:49:26 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998

No way they’re not gonna get to Congress.

But Trump should have staffed an administration that would have gone over the Obama admin’s illegal use of IRS tax powers and access long before now.

Joe Tea Party was never protected in a more important precedent.


17 posted on 07/09/2020 7:50:29 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998

I think both cases were remanded back to lower courts. This is not a loss for Trump...yet.


18 posted on 07/09/2020 7:50:40 AM PDT by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: janetjanet998

When he leaves office, whether next January or four years from now in January, the next Democrat in charge fully intends to imprison him


19 posted on 07/09/2020 7:51:28 AM PDT by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DesertRhino

?New Years?


20 posted on 07/09/2020 7:52:02 AM PDT by goodnesswins (The issue is never the issue. The issue is always the revolution." -- Saul Alinksy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson