Replies

Obviously not the same thing for a huge number of reasons. Not a perfect analogy but similar enough. Both are driven from politics. COVID insanity would not be taking place if it wasn't an election year. SARS, Ebola, Swine flu had a higher death rate, yet no such restriction were in place because it wasn't an election year. It's obvious scare mongering.

"wear a mask and it has genuine health benefits" There are numerous studies that refute that statement. If I'm not mistaken, someone linked them on this thread yesterday.

When you go in a store, wouldn't you like to reduce the chance that you breathe in the virus? Wouldn't you prefer that other people were at least trying not to spread the virus to you?

No, I wouldn't like to reduce my chance. I'd like to get it, produce antibodies and create herd immunity and have all this nonsense go away. I breathe in thousands of viruses everyday. One that has a 95% recovery rate doesn't worry me in the least. I also eat a strict diet of non-processed foods and take tinctures to keep my immune system healthy. I've been vaccinated for the flu once and it made me sick for 2 days. That was 25 years ago. I've had the flu once since then. (My husband also had the flu that year although he had been vaccinated due to work.) After seeing what goes on at my husband's job at a hospital, I'm rather skeptical of the medical "experts." Seems like there is a lot of vaccine and pill pushing for profit.

COVID insanity would not be taking place if it wasn't an election year.

Covid is affecting every country on Earth. It's not an election year in most of them.

SARS, Ebola, Swine flu had a higher death rate, yet no such restriction were in place

They didn't spread as rapidly because they killed people before they could spread the disease and there weren't as many asymptomatic or pre-symptomatic carriers.

No, I wouldn't like to reduce my chance. I'd like to get it, produce antibodies and create herd immunity and have all this nonsense go away.

Read this Twitter thread: