Posted on 11/08/2020 8:23:50 PM PST by Fitzy_888
Video at link.
I believe the standard for fraud is “preponderance of the evidence” and not “beyond reasonable doubt.”
Nothing but "MARKETING CLICK BAIT" in my eyes.
It’s beautiful English.
The math and stats are proven sciences....
Showing a “preponderance of evidence” is the requirement, although I’m not a lawyer. It doesn’t have to be “one thing”.
Mathematical impossibility is a far far more strict and reliable proof of a person's guilt (or innocence) than that old standard "burden of proof" that's usually required in a court of law, because the former is based on the strict unquestionable laws of logic. There is no fudging it quibbling about what is and what is not a "reasonable explanation." Unfortunately, strict mathematical logic just isn't applicable very often in a court of law.
However... in this case with the ballots, it is applicable. So we should use it. IMO.
“When you have eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, no matter how improbable, must be the truth.” Sir Arthur Conan Doyle. Who could win against Sherlock Holmes?
well...everybody needs to strap on and gird up their loins because we’re going to have to endure these next four weeks as this war heats up. Looks like there will be street rallies, and if we can’t be there support those who do by bending the knee as a prayer warrior for the attorneys and all those fighting on behalf of our President. The ground folks , those working for the attorneys gathering what is needed........but we do all have our part.
Bookmark
They gave to get a look at the ballots first so they can check them . Also you don’t need evidence when they didn’t have poll watchers. They spoiled evidence by not allowing poll workers.they are going to have to not use ballots counted after Election Day when there was no poll watchers. That is pretty damning evidence of fraud and this is not criminal court where more proof is necessary
“ Mathetical impossibilities doesn’t count as evidence in a court though.”
Yes it does.
From a licensed attorney in Pennsylvania, Nevada, Texas, and some Federal Courts.
Bookmarked.
So if your town, population 14,234, has an election, and there are 50,000 ballots (arguably a mathematical impossibility), this evidence does not count?
Courts are magicians when it comes to getting the wrong outcome, totally agreed. They are also institutions in the public eye. The court's credibility is on the line. Comes with the job.
Were all the ballots (1) printed on the same paper and (2) filled out on the same paper? Was there a watermark placed on the authorized ballot paper to indicate its legal identity? If there were ballots illegally manufactured, those answers could catch the illegal ballot activity.
If there was illegal tampering with the voting machine software, even my son-in-law who works at Microsoft would be able to look at the machine code language and determine what was done. Even if the illegal patch was deleted, a file recovery program can scan a hard drive for these deleted files and restore them.
I think a reward of a substantial amount of money could be offered for any information of fraud. There would be a huge number of rat finks who would turn each other in.
Anyone saying mathematical analysis has no role in court proceedings on vote fraud doesn’t know what they’re talking about.
1 or 2, maybe even a couple of hundred could be fairly innocent / lone mischievousness - but 10k?
That is factory farmed fraud and would have to involve a fair number of people.
And THAT is precisely what is going to happen.
But fraudsters don’t like MATH
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.