He is thinking he has to sound like he’s open-minded, and wants the fraud investigated because it’s wrong, not because the president will win. I imagine the person who signs his big, fat paycheck has encouraged him to think this way.
Tucker is a sellout. He is using the standard MSM talking point that there was no “widespread FRAUD.” As such, just move along.
At this point, nobody knows the extent of the fraud. It’s too early. More importantly, the results could change not only by fraud, but by illegal acts (preventing republicans from observing counts and counting illegal votes), and errors (machine counts).
The “there is no widespread fraud” talking point is pure misinformation and Tucker is a champion.