Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pa. Supreme Court rejects Trump campaign claim that Republicans lacked access to Philly vote count
Philly Inquirer ^

Posted on 11/17/2020 2:07:18 PM PST by TigerClaws

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that Republican monitors observing vote counting in Philadelphia were given sufficient access under state law to view the proceedings.

In a 5-2 decision, the court overturned a lower court decision that ordered monitors with President Donald Trump’s campaign be allowed within six feet of tables where ballots were being tallied.

(Excerpt) Read more at google.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: search
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

On up the ladder ...

1 posted on 11/17/2020 2:07:18 PM PST by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Expected


2 posted on 11/17/2020 2:07:59 PM PST by conservativepoet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fatima; Fresh Wind; st.eqed; xsmommy; House Atreides; Nowhere Man; PaulZe; brityank; Physicist; ...

Pennsylvania Ping!

Please ping me with articles of interest.

FReepmail me to be added to the list.

3 posted on 11/17/2020 2:08:20 PM PST by lightman (I am a binary Trinitarian. Deal with it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Totally useless the press any case against PA officials in State court...always go Federal.


4 posted on 11/17/2020 2:09:02 PM PST by lightman (I am a binary Trinitarian. Deal with it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

One step closer!


5 posted on 11/17/2020 2:09:30 PM PST by SelfhatingMillennial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Yes, where TWO SCOTUS orders were Ignored!

They’re gonna love getting this case, I hope


6 posted on 11/17/2020 2:09:34 PM PST by dp0622 (Tried a coup, a fake tax story, tramp slander, Russia nonsense, impeachment and a virus. They lost.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

PA Supreme Court is corrupt.


7 posted on 11/17/2020 2:10:44 PM PST by tennmountainman ( Liberals Are Baby Killers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

Yes. That’s the real issue in GA and PA.

Article 2 Section 1 of the Consitution States (with respect to how states select the “Electors” that go to the Electoral College:

quote:
Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.

This means, that the State Legislature decides how the Electors are set. Not the State Secretary of State and Not the State Court. The State Legislature.

In Bush v. Gore, Gore lost. He lost bc he was relying on a recount process that was designed by the Florida State Supreme Court. This process violated Article II Section 1 because it was not designed by a state legislature.

The COURT refused to allow the counting of votes pursuant to an unconstutional process.

In PA, the Mail In Ballot law passed by the legislature was essentially changed by the State Court. This is unconstitutional pursuant to the holding of Bush v. Gore. Further, PA legislative law requires observed counting. Per Rudy, 638,000ish ballots were UNOBSERVED. This violates the PA Law AS Written. The counting process is unconstitutional as applied by the poll workers (state actors) counting the votes. So per Bush v. Gore - unconstitutional ballots DO NOT COUNT.

In GA, the Mail In Ballot law passed by the legislature wasn’t followed. Instead, the SoS agreed to make guidance for counting votes in the manner he agreed to in a Settlement Agreement in a Voting Rights case brought by the Democrat Party. This Contract btwn the GA exec branch and the Democrat Party was NOT approved or passed into law by the legislature. This is unconstitutional pursuant to the holding of Bush v. Gore - which requires that the only counting method that can be applied is the one set by the State Legislature.

The argument isn’t voter fraud. The argument is mass violation of the constitutional procedure, as written by the GA SoS in a contract and as applied by PA in its shady arse counting procedures.

Rudy may be old, and bonkers and make a shitty presentation. But Rudy is RIGHT. If GA or PA makes it to SCOTUS - Trump is your President. Because of the incompetence or ill intent of the elected officials, who DID NOT FOLLOW their own law, or the COTUS.


8 posted on 11/17/2020 2:10:53 PM PST by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

What a bunch of hacks.


9 posted on 11/17/2020 2:11:28 PM PST by bray (Pray for President Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws


10 posted on 11/17/2020 2:12:28 PM PST by Travis McGee (EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lightman

GOOD! This now goes on up the chain of appeals, away from the leftist demon rat infected PA court. I would bet Justice Alito is watching very closely ... his gavel is a lot heavier than the fen of the leftist PA ‘supremes’


11 posted on 11/17/2020 2:13:27 PM PST by MHGinTN (A dispensation perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee

Every time I see that visual it brightens my day! Before our times the political cartoon was a powerful visual. Today it is brilliantly combined sarcasm. Keep them coming, Sir.


12 posted on 11/17/2020 2:17:51 PM PST by MHGinTN (A dispensation perspective is a powerful tool for discernment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: conservativepoet

Weren’t they ruled to have to let them in and they refused. Isn’t that proof they didn’t get to observe counting.


13 posted on 11/17/2020 2:18:59 PM PST by glimmerman70
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Interesting that poll workers weren’t for the most part six feet apart but the poll watchers had to be.


14 posted on 11/17/2020 2:19:26 PM PST by crager (I went to look for myself and if I happen to return while I'm gone tell me to wait.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Transylvanian Blackrobes choose twice
to IGNORE SCOTUS (Epstein Island, Harvard Law, Malta)
as BOTH ignore the Americans they are supposed to SERVE,
confusing them with “citizens”.


15 posted on 11/17/2020 2:19:46 PM PST by Diogenesis ("when a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced" )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN

Yes, good that this was done quickly. Moving on...


16 posted on 11/17/2020 2:19:48 PM PST by getitright (Finally- a president who fights back.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: All; null and void; LucyT

See this. Ms. Powell explains ,,,

https://mobile.twitter.com/peterdukephoto/status/1328798258857054209?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1328799262214299648%7Ctwgr%5E&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fthedonald.win%2Fp%2F11Q8uskK85%2Fscott-adams-everyone-close-to-th%2Fc%2F


17 posted on 11/17/2020 2:20:47 PM PST by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: glimmerman70

Facts do not matter to people who have a blood lust for power.


18 posted on 11/17/2020 2:24:09 PM PST by conservativepoet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Well yes... 7 corrupt democrat POS judges and two republicans ... what else would you expect.


19 posted on 11/17/2020 2:26:56 PM PST by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Everything you wrote makes perfect sense... but isn’t Trump still shy of 270—even with Pennsylvania and Georgia?

I think he needs to flip one more state (??)


20 posted on 11/17/2020 2:28:59 PM PST by davandbar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson