A Federal takeover of elections is unconstitutional from start to finish. Wonder why no one has contested it on those grounds. The Constitution has to be changed first.
“A Federal takeover of elections is unconstitutional from start to finish. Wonder why no one has contested it on those grounds. The Constitution has to be changed first.”
That’s ADORABLE Civics 101 and while you may be right, it would help you and the many others here to understand that Democrats AND THEIR JUDGES simply don’t give a shit about the Constitution when it gets in their way of imposing their dictatorship on this country. The ONLY use they even have for the Constitution is to use it DESTROY conservatives who might get in their way, such as saying that ‘free speech’ is their ‘Constitutional Right’ even when the speech is calling for violent overthrow of our government.
The bottom line is that if the Democrats ever get the VOTES they need in Congress, and control the White House, THEY WILL get what they want, and no damn piece of paper will stop them. We need to ACCEPT that fact, and stop wasting our time even referring to the Constitution. For our side, it means everything, for them, it’s a JOKE.
...so if people here really want to stop them, then SUCK IT UP and vote Republican in November elections and remember that even the WORST RINOS, including Murkowski, Romney, and Collins are against the destruction of our our electoral system (as they showed today)...while Manchin and EVERY other Democrat is on THEIR SIDE.
Did not have to be changed to let the ineligible Kenyan from Indonesia in.
Article I, Section 4 grants Congress broad powers in regulating federal Rep and Sen elections. But Article I, Section 7 appears to grant States exclusive authority to regulate the choosing of presidential electors.
As a practical matter States might go with a single set of regs rather than two or more.