[DugwayDuke]

Grey182 wrote: “That is not my intent.”
“There is a conscientious objection. This is still an experimental injection, as safety trials will not end until 2027.”

Your intent doesn’t matter. You have incited a member of the military to disobey a lawful order. And, no, these are no longer ‘experimental’. They are fully approved.

[Antoninus]

Your intent doesn’t matter. You have incited a member of the military to disobey a lawful order. And, no, these are no longer ‘experimental’. They are fully approved.

You are the poster-boy for why FR needs a *block* option.

[Whyfor]

As I understand it, the shot that is approved is not yet available.

[Grey182]

Why don’t you inform yourself before opening your trap.

A. It is NOT lawful, with a religious or medical exemption.

B. Only one was partially approved, and it is not available in the US, (and probably never will be).

[T.B. Yoits]

If the Pfizer one is fully approved, the others lose the Emergency Use Authorization. If the Pfizer one is approved, Pfizer loses indemnity from lawsuits, including for deaths PRIOR to the "approval".

Mr. Fauxi exposed the government with Unclean Hands as he lied when he said he didn't fund ban gain-of-function experiments. In addition to the Nuremberg Code and the Unclean Hands of the United States government, NO ONE has any authority to force a Jim Jones Jab on anyone.

[logi_cal869]

No, dumbass, “they” are not.