Posted on 03/24/2022 1:35:51 PM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer
If the commie RATS can get her in without GOP support, all the TRUE Republicans need to vote against her. It’s the smart thing to do. She’s a scumbag.
I called my two rat senators today.
“How does the Senator feel about child porn?”
One aide immediately said he’s against it. The other was silent for a beat them said he didn’t know. I said you got to be kidding.
I then told them judge Jackson has a weak record and gives unconscionably soft sentences to child predators. She has disqualified herself from consideration and they must vote no.
Yep.
There is not one single, breathing Democrat who isn’t aligned to burn this country to the ground and destroy it.
There is not one in that entire party I would shake the hand of.
Not one. And there are plenty on our side who appear to be fully in bed with them because they are allowed to be there.
Mittens probably watches a good chunk of child porn during his free time
“McConnell says he’ll vote against Jackson for Supreme Court”
The question is; does this make him a racist or a misogynists or just a Republican and which is worse according to the MSM?
He’s just a racist, as he has no more regard for the Constitution as intended than she does.
“The Republicans cannot get one Dem to vote against her?”
They will need more than that. Of the top of my head, I can name at least 4 Republicans that probably will vote YES.
Romney, Sasse, Collins, Murkowski
“I called my two rat senators today.”
You’re more committed than I am. My senators are Amy Klobuchar and Tina Smith. Quite seriously, they are about as useless of a pair of US senators that any state could be saddled with.
I’ll give Tina Smith a bit more credit than Amy. Smith worked her way up in Dem circles. She’s got credentials. I may not like them - but she has ‘em. Amy Klobuchar, on the other hand, got into the Senate because of her dad’s name and has been a useless blob since she arrived. Her job is to do whatever the Senator Majority Leader (Daschle, Reid and Schumer) tell her to do.
>>> The question is; does this make him a racist or a misogynists or just a Republican and which is worse according to the MSM? <<<
They’re displeased with Putin, but hate republicans.
I’d bet she stiffs white servers at restaurants.
For all of his huffing and puffery, Lindsey Graham is always an easy confirmation vote.
It’s scary that this woman was a sitting judge prior to this,
in any jurisdiction.
I’ve only watched a short bit of her testimony, but she
seems to have a bit of an attitude, an expectancy of
entitlement.
Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Would she recuse herself if a title 9 cases came before the court?
Wouldn’t be surprised at all.
I suspect she gets a pretty good sum on the lecture circuit,
on college campuses.
She may not participate, but I can sure imagine what sorts of
things she would be hawking if she did.
How can a person who doesn’t know what a woman is be capable of protecting Women’s Rights?
Big deal. RATs aleady have the votes.
Well, since she’s not a biologist, it would make sense.
Shocked??? Like I was shocked when I was elected to the Principal’s committee of my daughter’s school. The mom who ran the election called to tell me and asked if I had anything to say. I replied “ I want a recount.”
Graham will vote for her, along with Romney. I suspect Susan Collins will as well.
When my daughter was a server, not even the Black servers wanted to serve Black people. They would run her ragged, send food back, claim it wasn’t cooked right after they ate most of it and demand that the meal be comped. And invariably the manager would comp the meal and the server would get stiffed.
Black women were the worst. A single black man would usually tip pretty good, but if they were with a Black woman they wouldn’t leave a tip.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.