Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Medical Masks Similar to N95 Respirators for Preventing COVID-19
physiciansweekly ^ | 11/30/2022 | physiciansweekly

Posted on 11/30/2022 9:19:23 PM PST by bitt

TUESDAY, Nov. 29, 2022 (HealthDay News) — For health care workers providing care to patients with COVID-19, the risk for COVID-19 does not differ significantly with use of medical masks versus N95 respirators, according to a study published online Nov. 29 in the Annals of Internal Medicine.

Mark Loeb, M.D., from McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, and colleagues examined whether medical masks are noninferior to N95 respirators for preventing COVID-19 in health care workers providing routine care in a multicenter trial. Data were included for 1,009 health care workers at 29 health care facilities who provided direct care to patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 and used medical masks or fit-tested N95 respirators for 10 weeks.

The researchers found that in the intention-to-treat analysis, reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)-confirmed COVID-19 occurred in 10.46 and 9.27 percent of participants in the medical mask and N95 respirator groups, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 1.14; 95 percent confidence interval [CI], 0.77 to 1.69). In a subgroup analysis by country, RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 occurred in 6.11 and 2.22 percent of the medical mask versus N95 respirator groups in Canada, respectively (HR, 2.83; 95 percent CI, 0.75 to 10.72); in 35.29 versus 23.53 percent in Israel (HR, 1.54; 95 percent CI, 0.43 to 5.49); in 3.26 versus 2.13 percent in Pakistan (HR, 1.50; 95 percent CI, 0.25 to 8.98); and in 13.62 versus 14.56 percent in Egypt (HR, 0.95; 95 percent CI, 0.60 to 1.50).

“Among health care workers who took care of patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19, although the upper limit of the CIs of the pooled estimate for medical masks when compared with N95 respirators for preventing RT-PCR-confirmed COVID-19 was within the noninferiority margin of 2, this margin was wide, and firm conclusions about noninferiority may not be applicable given the between-country heterogeneity,” the authors write.

Abstract/Full Text


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: beyondthetrees; bitt; covid19; justtheflubro; masks; medicalmasks; n95respirators; qtard
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: Mark17

I can’t tell you the number of healthcare professionals I’ve caught over the last two years violating infection control protocols with regard to muzzles.

It’s infuriating.


21 posted on 12/01/2022 4:05:08 AM PST by mewzilla (We will never restore the republic if we don't first secure the ballot box.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla; nickcarraway; ransomnote; Jane Long; DoodleBob
Hospital-Acquired Infections Higher at Academic Hospitals During COVID-19 Peak

Hmmm, now why would that be.. ? 🤔

22 posted on 12/01/2022 4:08:35 AM PST by mewzilla (We will never restore the republic if we don't first secure the ballot box.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Hootowl99
Fascinating. So if I am reading you correctly, NONE of the N95 mask solutions would be effective against a biological attack -- even if that attack was, say, China or maybe a lab in Boston creating a 80% lethal version of Covid.
23 posted on 12/01/2022 4:12:24 AM PST by Lazamataz (The firearms I own today, are the firearms I will die with. How I die will be up to them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
Drug-resistant infections and deaths among hospital patients grew amid Covid-19 pandemic

What a coinkydink. Couldn't see this coming, eh?

24 posted on 12/01/2022 4:12:52 AM PST by mewzilla (We will never restore the republic if we don't first secure the ballot box.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: bitt

Masks are very effective. They keep other people away.


25 posted on 12/01/2022 4:17:40 AM PST by FarCenter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Do N95 respirators provide 95% protection level against airborne viruses, and how adequate are surgical masks?
26 posted on 12/01/2022 4:18:20 AM PST by mewzilla (We will never restore the republic if we don't first secure the ballot box.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: FarCenter

In some cases, not wearing masks keeps some people away.

I always have to not laugh when I’m out somewhere and happen to encounter someone masked up to the eyeballs when I almost bump into them and see the look of shock and terror when they see me unmasked. They literally back up in horror. You can see it in what shows of their faces.


27 posted on 12/01/2022 4:37:56 AM PST by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith…)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: bitt

They’re equally ineffective.


28 posted on 12/01/2022 5:11:29 AM PST by HIDEK6 (God bless Donald Trump. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt

N95 masks can stop down to .3 microns.
Average viruses range from .002 microns to .3 microns (rare cases up to .4 microns).
The MAJORITY of viruses will pass through a N95 mask

Translation to story - “Medical masks won’t stop the virus either.”


29 posted on 12/01/2022 5:26:57 AM PST by trebb (So many fools - so little time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt


30 posted on 12/01/2022 5:56:25 AM PST by norsky ( <P><img src=" "width=400"></img> <P> <a href= > </a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bitt
N95 respirators dust masks.
31 posted on 12/01/2022 5:58:22 AM PST by Pollard ( >>> The Great Reset is already underway! <<<)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob434

The medical profession really shot itself with the mishandling of this political fraud. Be damned if I’ll voluntarily return to a hospital setting as long as this nonsense continues. They can shove their “Nazi doc” and CDC protocols up their colon.


32 posted on 12/01/2022 6:09:40 AM PST by mcshot (If we're the best of the bunch we're in trouble.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bitt

So simply wearing a mask would have been enough without shots? Sheesh, how easy huh?


33 posted on 12/01/2022 6:56:38 AM PST by rktman (Destroy America from within? Check! WTH? Enlisted USN 1967 to end up with this? 😕)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trebb

I read early on the covid size was smaller han normal viruses, and at that time, masks were not being recommended because of it, and fauci and ilk, stating that the public should avoid masks because “the medical prof3ssion needs them, and couldn’t get them because civilians were ‘buying them all up or some such nonsense.


34 posted on 12/01/2022 7:17:50 AM PST by Bob434 (question)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: trebb

Bingo..... now try convincing the masses of sheep to see the facts as they are.


35 posted on 12/01/2022 9:40:33 AM PST by A Voice (As it was in the days of Noah, so shall it be in the end times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Sort of right … N95 is pretty good against bacteria. It's not real good against viruses, zip against chemical and zip against nuclear except with respect to the extent the radiological component is associated to a particulate and thus inhalation is reduced.

It all comes down to size. Bacteria are much larger in size compared to a virus and for example, are measured in micron dimension terms. 1 micron = 1 micrometer = 1 millionths of a meter. Viruses are measured in terms of nanometers. That is, 1 billionths of a meter.

For bacteria, these are normally observed and measured with an optical microscope. For viewing bacteria in any detail, it takes 1000x or greater magnification. The research grade microscope that I ran for 9 years was 2000x magnification. In theory, it could see about 0.5 micron (based on half the wavelength of visible light) but actually bent the theory and bumped down to a bit less than 0.1 micron.

Viruses are viewed with a scanning electron microscope. I never had a SEM but on 2 or 3 occasions, had a university microbiology department exam some samples for me and provide reports and photos of what they observed. Put simply, lung power is not strong enough to push air through any filter that's tight enough to remove viruses. An air pump is needed.

The N95 filter is certified via quality control testing to remove 95% of particulates sized 0.45 microns or larger IIRC. This is a known fact to every microbiologist and physician. At least until Covid when it became disinformation to point it out. It takes a HEPA type filter to remove viruses. I described briefly a personal type HEPA filter I became aware of a few years ago. HEPA filters have been around for 50 plus years.

It's not uncommon for persons with something like asthma to have a HEPA filter and/or an electrostatic filter for the house. These home use systems are typically installed and serviced by a higher end HVAC company. The filters are installed on the main discharge duct near the the blower so the whole house receives the purified air. A house with a whole HEPA filter system is a fairly safe place to be in the case of your hypothetical biological attack- At least for awhile until the filter plugs up.

For a number of years, 3M has marketed home air filters in standard sizes that at the high end have HEPA certification IIRC. Check Home Depot for these and I think you can also order them from 3M direct. I’ve tried these a few times. Good, they are terrific filters. Bad, your electrical bill will increase because their high pressure drop means the HVAC has to run longer ($$$) and you have to change them more frequently ($$$).

For NBC (nuclear, biological, chemical) level protection), I think it takes a HEPA filter plus 1 or more varieties of activated carbon for rated protection. For a large scale system, it wouldn’t surprise me if nano filtration or related technologies were a part of the puzzle for the air filtration system. I'm not real familiar with this NBC stuff. BTW…. My background is microbiology and chemical engineering. Degreed and experienced in both. Contentedly retired now.

36 posted on 12/01/2022 12:33:00 PM PST by Hootowl99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Bob434

Yep - and folks never do the math - or they’d realize that for viruses on the low-end, the mask would be like making a basketball hoop 15 feet across - and that’s the n95 mask - the hoop would be the size of the whole court with the blue masks 98% of then were wearing.


37 posted on 12/03/2022 3:55:59 AM PST by trebb (So many fools - so little time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: metmom

Thry probably pee th3mselves a little bit. Amazingly,people are still wearing masks. I’m not sure the health industry like health centers, hospitals doctors offices etc will ever get back to not requiring patients to wear masks. All over a virus with a near 100% survivability rate.


38 posted on 12/03/2022 7:19:52 AM PST by Bob434 (question)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson