Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rockingham

>Russian control of Ukraine would be a major threat to their security that has to be averted if at all possible.

I don’t see Russia or Poland crossing the Dnieper. I’m guessing that Russia takes the east side and Poland takes the west as a protectorate, while Russia demands no missiles or other materiel of war be placed on the west side of Ukraine.


22 posted on 03/22/2023 9:47:22 AM PDT by struggle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: struggle

Russia doesn’t get a voice on the NATO council so they can shove their demands right up their Putin.


24 posted on 03/22/2023 9:52:53 AM PDT by MeganC (There is nothing feminine about feminism. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: struggle

What’s up with this 19th Century protectorate talk?

Single powers don’t do protectorates anymore, and haven’t for almost 100 years. They do mutual partner alliances at best.

Ukraine will just be a smaller country.


26 posted on 03/22/2023 10:01:43 AM PDT by Alas Babylon! (Gov't declaring misinformation is tyranny: “Who determines what false information is?” )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: struggle

Quite plausible, except for the part about the west portion of Ukraine being demilitarized. That is the equivalent of the bear saying, “Leave the rest on the table. I will be hungry again soon.”


27 posted on 03/22/2023 10:12:29 AM PDT by Rockingham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson