My only point is that you have to measure election turnout consistently. They have chosen to measure eligible voters rather than registered voters. The attempts to make the turnout 92% rather than 67% should tell you everything you need to know about the fraud election crybabies around here. They are dishonest.
I don't see it. Being a person that never kept up with how "turnout" was measured in the past, upon looking at the issue it seems obvious to me that the correct methodology for measuring "turnout" is to see what percentage of registered voters showed up at the polls.
The idea of using people who never bothered to register as part of the equation would never have occurred to me.
But let us say for a moment that your argument is correct. What is the normal "turnout" for a presidential election measured the way you say it has always been measured?