Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: joesbucks

Nothing slimy about what he said.

The full and complete text shows a human being admitting a human being has emotional reactions that aren’t always pure and uses reason and logic to keep them in check.

If he had concluded “kill the little punk anyway” then there would be a problem, but he didn’t, he recognized his emotions were wrong and concluded correctly that the man was a human and did not be happy at his suffering.

Only in the left wing world gone made is this text some sort of recrimination


52 posted on 05/03/2023 3:20:15 AM PDT by HamiltonJay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: HamiltonJay

I found the text to be uplifting as it were. A man who examines his emotions and through logic and moral reason concludes that instead of allowing himself to be turned into a morally bankrupt person like the Antifa creep, he wants to be a better person. One that does not resort to violence first. Thus his conclusion is that he wants to be a better person. How is that bad? So the left, and Fox think this makes Tucker look bad? He wants to be a better person? Is that where we are now? Those who seek to be moral and to stand for something are somehow bad? Sad times indeed.


60 posted on 05/03/2023 4:26:18 AM PDT by yukong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

To: HamiltonJay

I agree that the left wing gets more upset with patent or latent racism. But it seems the fear is the it will upset people on the right. Otherwise, the pushback would be nonexistent.


70 posted on 05/03/2023 6:44:56 AM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson