Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ridesthemiles

A recent thread on natural born citizenship had over 300 replies.

This subject has been discussed quite a bit, here on Free Republic.

There is no Free Republic consensus on this subject.


25 posted on 09/03/2023 12:06:02 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Dilbert San Diego

I think you are right that there is no consensus.

But the law does not require consensus. A baby is a natural born citizen of the US if 2 things exist:

1) The baby is born on US soil to parents who are US citizens, or if not US citizens, are under the jurisdiction of the US.

2) The baby is born on US soil at that time NOT under the control / jurisdiction of a hostile military presence.

Item 2 happened in WW II when Japanese troops temporarily occupied Aleutian Islands.

Item 1 depends on soil and jurisdiction and the only way foreign citizen parents are not under the jurisdiction of the US when on US soil is if they have presented diplomatic credentials to the US State Dept.

Jurisdiction: the territory or sphere of activity over which the legal authority of a court or other institution extends

That means US soil. And no diplomatic credentials.

There is nothing more to debate.


34 posted on 09/03/2023 12:35:34 PM PDT by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson