Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Owen

There is some more to debate. You have explained a common understanding among many people, which is appreciated.

But there is more to debate, as to how Obama and Kamala were elected to positions in spite of not meeting the criteria for natural born citizenship, and how Vivek and Nikki Haley are campaigning for president.

In other words, why is there no legal impediment, no legal authority to prevent unqualified candidates from running for office? That specific aspect of this should be discussed.


40 posted on 09/03/2023 12:47:08 PM PDT by Dilbert San Diego
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]


To: Dilbert San Diego

That is a different question. In a different thread perhaps.

This is about the definition of natural born citizen. Not about who qualifies. If someone fits the definition then they do qualify. I just looked at Harris’ bio. She has two non American parents, neither of whom presented diplomatic credentials to the US State Dept.

They and she were therefore subject to US jurisdiction when she was born on US soil. How can there be more debate. This is the clear specified condition.

And I have just looked at this Nikki Haley person. Born on US soil to parents, neither of whom presented diplomatic credentials to the US State Dept. And thus they and she were subject to US jurisdiction. How can there be more debate.


45 posted on 09/03/2023 3:59:01 PM PDT by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson