Posted on 09/27/2023 5:33:06 PM PDT by nickcarraway
Extreme global warming is likely to wipe out all mammals – including humans – in 250 million years, according to a brand new first-ever scientific study.
It has been reported that temperatures on Earth could skyrocket to around 70C (185F) which would ultimately transform the planet from what we know it to be like now, into a ‘hostile environment devoid of food and water’, the researcher who conducted this study has warned everyone.
If this study is to come true, then it would mean Earth’s temperature would simply become too hot for mammals to live and would no longer be able to survive as we/they all do now, but that is not all that would change.
There would also be a form of continental drift and all of the continents would eventually merge together due to the changes which would mean the world would just become one major continent that was a hot, dry and uninhabitable supercontinent.
Supercomputer Predicts Human Extinction
These damning and frankly, quite scary predictions, come from the first-ever supercomputer climate model which is used to look into the future using scientific data and analysis.
This supercomputer has predicted that the sun will drastically become brighter due to tectonic movements which would then see an increased amount of carbon dioxide emitted into the air via several volcanic eruptions, whcih is a natural disaster that always shakes the world when a major one occurs.
Due to this change in the sun and climate shock, the Earth would reportedly become incredibly hot and just 8-16% of the ‘supercontinent’ would be habitable, making life on Earth extremely difficult for mammals.
Humans are said to be more adapt to living in cooler conditions – which is why Earth is perfect for billions of people – so this extreme heat which could be coming in the future should send alarm bells ringing.
Global Warming Will Not Hold Back
The study was led by Dr. Alexander Farnsworth of the University of Bristol and he said: “The newly emerged supercontinent would effectively create a triple whammy, comprising the continentality effect, hotter sun and more CO2 in the atmosphere, of increasing heat for much of the planet.
“The result is a mostly hostile environment devoid of food and water sources for mammals. Widespread temperatures of between 40C to 50C, and even greater daily extremes, compounded by high levels of humidity would ultimately seal our fate.
“Humans – along with many other species – would expire due to their inability to shed this heat through sweat, cooling their bodies.”
Really?
Will it rain here tomorrow?
250M years! Why that’s practically next week. Okay, everyone quickly start eating only bugs, riding bicycles, and forego heat and AC in your homes to maybe make that 251M years. It’s for the children ya know!
Imagine my concern.
I’ll run my computations again, but I’m pretty certain that this event is more likely to be in 278,375,000 years. Give or take a century or two. You can quote me on that.
“I think that’s when Sun becomes so hot that pretty much everything on the Earth will die”
The Sun in a quarter billion years is likely beginning the early days of turning into a red giant, the inner planets will be vaporized long before the Sun explodes and a white dwarf is left over.
GIGO
Women and minorities will be hardest hit.
Complete horseshit. The movement of tectonic plates have nothing to do with the sun's brightness....
The title should be, “First-Ever Climate Supercomputer Programmed to Predict Likely Human Extinction”
A computer can only do what it is programmed to do. Period.
Big pharma will wipe us out before Mother Nature.
Yep, the sun will boil off the oceans unless there’s some super advanced way to change the orbit by intelligent descendants by then by changing the orbit or blocking the heat. By 500m years it’ll be really difficult or impossible.
It’s a bit alarming to me that after 4+ billion years intelligent life evolved only in the last 500m possible on Earth. It’s a bit of a Fermi Paradox solution that it might take more time to develop intelligence on most planets than the habitation period.
This article bringing up human caused climate change at all is stupid. Even if we burned all combustibles on Earth and raise CO2 to the max, and it causes predicted changes, within 20k years or so thing would naturally return to normal after.
Of course it is.
2Pe 3:6 Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished:
2Pe 3:7 But the heavens and the earth, which are now, by the same word are kept in store, reserved unto fire against the day of judgment and perdition of ungodly men.
2Pe 3:8 But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.
2Pe 3:9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
2Pe 3:10 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.
I hated that song!
The Sun in a quarter billion years is likely beginning the early days of turning into a red giant,
_____
Yes, Sun has still few billion years to go, but the process will start “soon” in cosmic scale.
The humanity shall better find some solution or we will go extinct.
But heck, in 6.000 years we made it from stone age to the Moon.
I do not even dare to predict, what we will do in the next 250,000 years, unless we are forced back to the caves by our Enviro “friends”.
Small wonder, that. How-Dare-You girl must dig it.
I am a mechanical engineer. Sometimes I have to create or work with a computer model of a structure. We have a saying in the world of finite element analysis:
All models are wrong. Some are useful.
It is very easy to falsify modeling results if no one knowledgeable about finite element modeling is reviewing the work, or if the reviewer is sloppy. So how hard would it be for a self-righteous climate scientist funded by politicians or the green energy industry to create a computer model biased toward predicting a dire future that requires people to drastically reduce our standard of living, cede our personal autonomy, and invest heavily in green technologies in order to avoid this dire future? Quite simple.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.