Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tlozo

You’re dreaming.

NATO does not have the military assets, aside from ICBMs.


40 posted on 03/24/2024 6:55:36 AM PDT by grey_whiskers ( The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: grey_whiskers
You’re dreaming.

NATO does not have the military assets, aside from ICBMs.

Talk about someone being delusional. Tomahawk missiles, F-117 Nighthawks, F35's, etc.

43 posted on 03/24/2024 7:03:02 AM PDT by tlozo ( Better to Die on Your Feet than Live on Your Knees )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: grey_whiskers

You might want to ask the Russians who tried to attack a small contingent of marines in Syria about assets?
Of course you can’t because they all died.

Without proper air support the Ukranians are fighting at a distinct disadvantage, that will not be the case with NATO involvement

Russian bombers will be destroyed within hours along with Russian fleet both Baltic and black sea.

T-62s and 55s will be nothing but armored coffins

Yup Russia is unstoppable/s


77 posted on 03/25/2024 3:39:44 AM PDT by blitz128
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson