Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Jonty30

Question. Assuming it was an accident, who designs a bridge other a single point of catastrophic failure? I am not an engineer, but that does not seem right.


42 posted on 03/28/2024 9:49:04 PM PDT by MPJackal ("From my cold dead hands." )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: MPJackal

I’m not going to get into the possibility of terrorism, but at the time this bridge was built, container ships had a carrying capacity of under 5,000 tons, or so. This ship had a tonnage of 150,0000 tonnes.

It’s also age. This bridge was about 50 years and near the end of its useful life just from wear and tear.


43 posted on 03/28/2024 9:55:46 PM PDT by Jonty30 (A rich man is called a sugar daddy. A poor man is called into HR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: MPJackal

Aren’t they ALL built this way?


70 posted on 03/29/2024 4:32:37 AM PDT by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

To: MPJackal

That bride was like two seesaws. When one crash it flipped the other up and it crashed too. This design makes the bridge more light weight and costs less. There is one problem: risk of catastrophic failure.


114 posted on 03/29/2024 9:26:50 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson