I think it is a mistake to lump Theodore Roosevelt "progressivism" in with modern "progressivism." There are distinct differences between what Teddy did and what modern liberals do.
The Anti-trust stuff he did was necessary. He did a lot of things that needed to be done in way of separating corporations from having so much influence on government, which is pretty much the opposite of what modern liberals do.
It can only be a mistake if there’s no direct line.
But there is a direct line. So the facts dictate our opinions. At least, they dictate mine.