[Captain Peter Blood]

SCOTUS cannot intervene unilaterally something has to go to the court for them to make a ruling. That clear enough?

[j.havenfarm]

Jane, maybe I can be more helpful than the good Cap’n, and certainly I can be less snotty and give a response that is less incoherent:

In California, at least, the order is non-appealable. Relief could only be had by a writ to the appellate court. If denied, then to the CA Supreme Court. In state court actions, SCOTUS only has jurisdiction to review decisions of the highest court in the state. No other case is necessary; THIS case goes up the ladder. I think it’s a pretty long shot SCOTUS. Would agree to review the issue

[Jane Long]

LOL...at least you cleaned up your poor grammar.

[jpsb]

SCOTUS cannot intervene unilaterally something has to go to the court for them to make a ruling. That clear enough?

Incorrect.