The article wasn't the clearest, but I think their point was that, if Trump is stridently anti-abortion, he risks driving liberals who might be tempted to vote Kennedy back onto the Biden plantation, and that might make the difference in some states.
“...if Trump is stridently anti-abortion...”
I don’t see it that way. Trump is the first president that came in with a blank sheet concerning the politics of the nation. He really was the first president to come in with a look at the needs of the people and not those of the party. And his actions displayed it.
He threw the press off his plane. He cost China an s-pot of money they had been soaking the people here with by creating the opportunity for the market to flourish. He wouldn’t play the game with the border to try to soak in voters, he stayed within the treaties and asked the Ukraine to investigate possible business irregularities even though a politician was involved, middle-Class family income increased nearly $6,000 – more than five times the gains during the entire previous administration, the unemployment rate reached 3.5 percent, the lowest in a half-century...
And almost all of these things, and more, could have been accomplished by anyone since Reagan...but Trump did it. He understands what a president is, a business manager that overseas the country. Not run it or order it like a dictator even while his own party did the exact thing the liberals wanted and shunned Trump. So if anyone thinks he did all these things for the vote, when he was already rich and famous, then they under estimate him and their reasoning is being swayed by politics and not seeing him. He had nothing personal to gain...but we did. And we got most of it only because of him.
wy69