I’d acquit without a second thought.
Previouslt posted here on FR...
During the testimony of forensic scientist Rick Wyant, defense attorney Brenna Larkin asked, “So number one, you can’t prove who the shooter was, correct?” to which Wyant answered, “That’s correct.”
“You can’t prove which firearm caused this wound. Is that correct?” she asked.
“Caused the wound? Correct.”
“You can’t prove which type of ammunition caused this wound, correct?”
“That is true.”
“You can’t prove which bullet caused this wound, correct?”
“Also true.”
“Can’t prove which direction this shot came from, correct?”
“Correct.”
“And we can’t prove how far away this shot came from other than further than 6 feet away from this person, correct?”
“Yes, true.”
The Regime does not want the invaders scared by locals who might shoot them. Somewhat like the trial against Kyle Rittenhouse, where the enemy did not want rioters scared of people who might shoot them.
Just saw this on twitter or X Chorus Nylander KVOA
@CNylanderKVOA
·
7m
GEORGE KELLY: Jury is at an impasse, judge has asked them to continue deliberating.
@KVOA https://x.com/CNylanderKVOA/status/1781440252768649296
Oh boy. The media tells us what we need to know again.
He forgot two important things...shovel and SHUT UP!
and Santa Cruz County is owned by the cartels