Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tenderstone jr.
Clinton may not have been the best president ever,

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

What? Don't sugar coat it. He was by far THE WORST president ever. He is a criminal and a rapist who sold or gave away our nuclear crown jewels.

33 posted on 09/16/2001 8:00:19 PM PDT by doug from upland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: doug from upland
What? Don't sugar coat it. He was by far THE WORST president ever. He is a criminal and a rapist who sold or gave away our nuclear crown jewels.

By what objective standards is Clinton the worst president ever? What are the facts (not accusations) to support that statement?

How is Clinton a criminal? What specific crimes did he commit? Where is the damning evidence? How come Clinton was never charged as a criminal? He was investigated more than any man in history, so if he committed some crimes, they have to be a matter of record by now. So where are the indictments?

Unjustly accusing someone of something bad is easy, though evil, to do. Satan stands by the throne and lies about each one of us to Abba every day. Accusation is meaningless meanness unless there is also proof of guilt. So where is the evidence, the indictments, the complaints, the charges of crime against Clinton?

If there are no indictments, no charges, no evidence, then there are no crimes. Which makes calling Clinton a criminal a slanderous, evil thing to do.

As to rape, I studied the case and listened to Juanita's tearful testimony. Then I got down my Bible and sought the Lord's opinion. He told me that under these circumstances, no rape occured. Which meant that Clinton wasn't a rapist and should never be called one.

I don't know what "crown jewels of our nuclear arsenal" means, but it doesn't matter, because Clinton neither sold nor gave away any nuclear secrets. One of the many things he was investigated for was being in on an illegal and unethical deal to transfer missle technology to China through Loral, but once it was looked iunto, that charge evaporated. Went poof! There was nothing to it.

However, it is true that the president allowed top-secret U.S. missle technology fall into Chinese hands. But it was a different president; one named Bush.

Other than that, I agree with everything you said.

44 posted on 09/16/2001 11:21:33 PM PDT by Hidy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson