To: karth
I certainly read the whole speech and I maintain every point in my article. It was really disgusting. Please read professor Thomas Sowell's article on Clinton's speech. Sowell is one of the highest intellects in U.S. and you will find that he shares my views of Clinton's ramblings against our country. You can spin all you want, but Clinton's words leave no doubt about his message.
50 posted on
11/16/2001 1:18:23 PM PST by
Dqban22
To: Dqban22; Cardenas
Now, I DID read the Sowell article but I most certainly do not believe that either of you 2 read the full text of Clinton's speech.
Sowell's article is pathetic. He didn't read the speech either. He's working off the little excerpt and dishonest spin from the original Washington Times article. And he's got it all bass ackwards. This guy is not an intellectual.
Read the speech. Its long but cogent. It obviously wasn't delivered by someone who was drunk, so that alone should cause you to distrust the pundits who told you Clinton was drunk. I mean, this is not Dan Quayle turning the motto of the UNCF into "What a terrible thing it is to lose one's mind." Clinton's message is hopeful one, if you read it with an honest mind.
54 posted on
11/16/2001 1:18:47 PM PST by
karth
To: Dqban22
"Sowell is one of the highest intellects in the U.S...."
Is that a Timothy Leary high?
To: Dqban22
Thanks for posting. I knew there was somebody that BC reminded me of - I just couldn't quite pin it down...
And I hope San Ignacio de Loyola goes and sows the beds of contemporary Jesuits with thorns. They're disgusting, arrogant, self-obsessed non-Christians - but hey, I guess that's why they invited Bill C in the first place. True soul brothers.
65 posted on
11/16/2001 1:20:49 PM PST by
livius
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson