STUDY: "'GAY' SUBSET COMMITS MULTIPLE REPEATED CHILD SEX OFFENSES"

LifeSite ^

[Notwithstanding]

3 to 4.5 boys victimized per homosexual male while 1 girl is victimized per 11 heterosexual males

CRESTWOOD, KY, November 14, 2001 (LSN.ca) - An important research paper by Dr. Judith Reisman, demonstrates with statistics from the 1992 US Statistical Abstracts that the 'gay' population contains a vast subset which "commits multiple, repeated child sex offenses."

Dr. Reisman is the famous psychologist who discovered that the main body of research which led to the sexual revolution was fraudulent. In her seminal work on the father of modern sexology, Alfred Kinsey, Reisman showed that Kinsey paid pedophiles to sexually experiment with children as young as 2 years of age. Kinsey later used that "data" to give impetus to pedophilia by claiming that children are sexual from birth.

Reisman cites the 1992 Statistical Abstract of the United States saying that 6 to 8 million boys are sexually victimized by members of the approximately 2 million-strong gay community in the US (2% of the adult male population in the US). Comparatively, the statistics indicate that 9% of the heterosexual adult male population of approximately 87 million are responsible for the victimization of 8 million girls. Thus the ratio shows 3 to 4.5 boys are victimized per homosexual male while 1 girl is victimized per 11 heterosexual males. Reisman concludes that since not all homosexuals males sexually assault boys, a "'gay' subset commits multiple, repeated child sex offenses," each with an average number of victims above 4.

Reisman's full report "Crafting Gay Children" can be found at: http://rsvpamerica.org/crafting%20august%202001.htm#_edn93

See also the RSVP home page: http://rsvpamerica.org

[Ol' Sparky]

There is rampant promotion of pedophilia in the homosexual community, in homosexual magazines, books from Alyson Press, major movies and plays. Yet, you rejects the clear evidence that pedophilia (boys playing the female role for "chicken hawks") is occurring. The San Francisco Sentinel even admitted, "pedophilia is the foundation of homosexuality." Yet, like anti-semities reject Bin Laden's admission of guilt, you reject the rampant advocacy of pedophilia in the homosexuality community.

And, yes, the Justice Department numbers DON'T lie -- 27% of all children under 12 are boys molested by men. Only a dim wit can't figure out pedophilia is disportionally occurring due to the behavior of homosexual men.

There are literally dozens of studies -- researchers that actually study the behavior of homosexual men -- that have shown homosexual men molest between 20-40% of all children.

The Gay Report -- done by homosexual researchers -- interviewed adult homosexual men and 23% admitted to having sex with boys under the age of 16.

But the overwhelming evidence doesn't matter to you. You only care about believing the propaganda that has been drilled into your mind.

[EdReform]

BUMP!!

[Texaggie79]

If you diddle little boys, you be gay.

I could really care less about what label you carry. My point is pretty much made in #107.

[Brian Allen]

NotTheDevil:

I am sure that you have no difficulty in finding something akin to a feeling of moral superiority [The closest you will ever come to the real thing!] in the mess of envy-motivated and hatred and rage engined Psychopathological Projection through whose distorting lens you view the world and from whose false premises descend your "argument" seen from different and less distorting persectives as somewhat obsessive -- and Absolutely pointless -- attempts to parse words in your Quixotic endeavor to defend the indefensible.

Me? To save myself the trouble of having to explain that which they cannot even begin to understand to those literalists who are too stupid and/or too abjectly amoral to be aware of any of their stupidity, their consequential effective ignorance and/or the amorality of their arguments; [And to any and all others who have similarly placed themselves beyond the pale] I kinda like to keep it simple.

So I am going to stick with "Us Good men -- and them others!"

You arrogant p....!

[jwalsh07]

It doesn't matter what she says. Here are the facts. Homosexual men commit 27%(US Justice Department) of the rapes of children under 12 while representing maybe 5%(Who Knows) of the population.

Do you recognise that there is an identifiable problem there?

[NYCVirago]

There is rampant promotion of pedophilia in the homosexual community, in homosexual magazines, books from Alyson Press, major movies and plays.

How about Britney Spears being pushed as a sex symbol when she was all of sixteen years old? Does that count as rampant promotion of pedophilia in the heterosexual community?

[TexanAmerican]

Only the liberal media refuses to accept the fact that queers are perverts and child molesters!

[Ol' Sparky]

No, you don't get it. The fact pedophilia is being promoted by homosexual publications reflects how rampant the behavior. The magazines, books and movies are marketed for sale to a homosexual audience. Those publishing and producing these articles, books and movies realize just how large the market is for child-sex in the homosexual community.

BTW, yes, Britney Spears is teaching young girls to be tramps. Anyone that doesn't think she has an influence is disconnected from the real world.

[EdReform]

"Are you on the payroll of the Family Research Institute /Narth or do you just volunteer your time? "

I'm not on the payroll nor do I volunteer with either of these organizations.

You can be honest with us

L_Candide

member since November 12th, 2001

were you sent here by GLAAD, HRC, P-FLAG, or GLSEN? Or are you a disgruntled member of NAMBLA who doesn't want the TRUTH to be known? Why are YOU defending homosexual pedophilia?

Just curious.

[EdReform]

"...Does that count as rampant promotion of pedophilia in the heterosexual community?"

An excerpt from "Pedophilia Chic" Reconsidered - The taboo against sex with children continues to erode By Mary Eberstadt:

"...For elsewhere in the public square, the defense of adult-child sex — more accurately, man-boy sex — is now out in the open. Moreover, it is on parade in a number of places—therapeutic, literary, and academic circles; mainstream publishing houses and journals and magazines and bookstores—where the mere appearance of such ideas would until recently have been not only unthinkable, but in many cases, subject to prosecution...

For one thing, no sustained public challenges have arisen over other primal taboos. Even more telling, if nihilism and nihilism alone were the explanation for public attempts to legitimize sex with boy children, then we would expect the appearance of related attempts to legitimize sex with girl children; and these we manifestly do not see. Nobody, but nobody, has been allowed to make the case for girl pedophilia with the backing of any reputable institution. Publishing houses are not putting out acclaimed anthologies and works of fiction that include excerpts of men having sex with young girls. Psychologists and psychiatrists are not competing with each other to publish studies demonstrating that the sexual abuse of girls is inconsequential; or, indeed, that it ought not even be defined as "abuse."

Two examples from the last few weeks will suffice to show the double standard here. In the November 12 New York Times Book Review, a writer found it unremarkable to observe of his subject, biographer Gavin Lambert, that when "Lambert was a schoolboy of 11, a teacher initiated him [into homosexuality], and he 'felt no shame or fear, only gratitude.'" It is unimaginable that New York Times editors would allow a reviewer to describe an 11-year-old girl being sexually "initiated" by any adult (in that case, "initiation" would be called "sexual abuse"). Similarly, in mid-December the New York Times Magazine delivered a cover piece about gay teenagers in cyberspace which was so blasé about the older men who seek out boys in chat rooms that it dismissed those potential predators as mere "oldies." Again, one can only imagine the public outcry had the same magazine published a story taking the same so-what approach to online solicitation, off-line trysts, and pornography "sharing" between anonymous men and underage girls..."

[Zipporah]

Dr. Reisman has been around for a very long time. Her work in regard to the Kinsey Report is documented.

[Notwithstanding]

Dr. Judith Reisman continues to work tirelessly on behalf of children - as she did while working for the Capt Kangaroo show as a communications professsional. She apparently hase diverse interests and talents within her prodfessional filed and has chosen to put her expertise to work in helping children by seeing how evil forms of communication like pronography effect children. What a wonderful project. You defend pedophilic homosexual behavior and pornography as is your right. And it is my right to say "SHAME ON YOU! - YOU DEFFEND THE INDEFENSIBLE AND MOCK THOSE DEFENDING CHILDREN FROM SEX PERVERTS."

[Richard Kimball]

Although you've already been smoke out as a plant by other Freepers, I thought I'd add a couple of other articles from your "source article" website. It lists itself as the "Adult Christianity" website, so here are a few of the "Christian" articles from it.

"Abortion is NOT a sin" by Poppy Dixon
"Blood Libel -- The Roots of Racism and the Fear of Sex in the Pro-life Movement" by Poppy Dixon
"Eating Fetuses: The lurid Christian fantasy of godless Chinese eating 'unborn children.'" by Poppy Dixon
It additionally has a link to "Abortion Clinics OnLine. The world's largest online source for abortion clinic websites"-- That's the claim of the web site, not mine

Another section takes you to Wiccan resources.

Another link takes you to a Bible "storybook" in which children's toys are photographed appearing to have sexual intercourse to "illustrate" Bible stories.

Oh, and here's a statement from one of their advertisers: "Spell Casting by Andreika the Witch; Spell Casting by Andreika, the most powerful witch of all. Her spells are absolutely guaranteed to work, or your money back!"

Sorry son, but your post reminds me of the opening song from Shrek; "Somebody once told me the world was gonna roll me, I ain't the sharpest tool in the shed. She was lookin' kinda dumb with her finger and her thumb in the shape of an L on her forehead..."

Next time, find someone who has one of these to come and disrupt for you.

[Notwithstanding]

Why don't you just go ahead and admit you are the real Poppy Dixon - or are you really Andreika the Witch - or both? Will the real shill L_Candide please stand up?

[Notwithstanding]

NotTheDevil is a distortionist. Out of 50 media outlets - including the the NYT and the British Medical Journal Lancet - you single out Geraldo and Sally Jesse in order to make your lie sound more plausible. Are you a pedophile or do you just defend them?