The JFK assassination is full of basic conflicts. The Dealy Plaza route made a perfect setting for an ambush. Bullets were flying all over. I think it is interesting how Nixon happened to be there and taunted JFK in print about using the presidential limo bubble. JFK did not use it, making the assassination possible.
Then there are the railroad bums caught behind the grassy knoll. Their arrest records disappeared, but there is one great photograph of them. One looks just like E. Howard Hunt. Another like Frank Sturgis. Both of them Nixon men. The third one looks like Woody Harrelson's dad, a known shooter.
If you can explain away 20-50 gross conflicts in the official version, then anyone with an IQ greater than his belt size will find 200 more conflicts.
The official version does not work. I think various power groups wanted JFK dead. LBJ benefited. The Mafia benefited. Hoover hated both Kennedys brothers. He had to be happy. In fact, there is a photo of him looking at the coffin and appearing smug. But he was out of town. Hmm. And some right-wing nuts were happy. Milteer was one. I think there is a photo of him near the motorcade, grinning. Correct my facts if I am wrong. This is from memory.
Lee Oswald - 200 contradictions right there. A TV special said that his grave was disturbed. When the body was dug up, a Lee Oswald head was produced. But the undertaker said that was not the head he buried. Weirder and weirder.
There were 3 shots. Nixon wasn't there at the time. The bubble only kept out rain, not bullets. Nixon didn't taunt him about it.
Then there are the railroad bums caught behind the grassy knoll. Their arrest records disappeared, but there is one great photograph of them. One looks just like E. Howard Hunt. Another like Frank Sturgis. Both of them Nixon men. The third one looks like Woody Harrelson's dad, a known shooter.
The arrest records are public documents, their names are known. They were three bums.
If you can explain away 20-50 gross conflicts in the official version, then anyone with an IQ greater than his belt size will find 200 more conflicts.
It is a basic truth in any complex case that you can find all kinds of open questions or things that don't make sense by themselves. Look at the OJ case. Does that mean he didn't really do it? No. A question is just a question, it isn't evidence. The evidence says Oswald did it. It says that convincingly. The ability to ask questions doesn't subtract it. The fact is, many of the questions are false questions, as are many of the "facts" being offered in this thread right now. This has happened because for 38 years we've had people writing nonsensical books, repeating false assertions and making up stories. Nobody can be blamed for thinking there is something to them, but if you do the work to find out you'll find there isn't.