Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Swiss[Patriots] Reject Army Proposal (78% Refuse To Disarm +Disband Militia-Style Army!)
Irish Times, New York Times, MSNBC, Agency France ^ | December 3, 2001 | News Staffs

Posted on 12/03/2001 4:51:52 PM PST by t-shirt

Monday, December 3, 2001

Swiss reject army proposal

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

SWITZERLAND: Swiss voters have overwhelmingly rejected a proposal to abolish their armed forces, considered by many in the neutral, alpine nation as a vital part of their lives.

The referendum proposal was put forward by the Switzerland Without An Army group, which argued the country does not face any military threat and shelving the largely reservist-based army would not diminish security.

Some 78 per cent of Swiss voters disagreed, also rejecting a second initiative by the group to establish a voluntary civilian peace corps aimed at defusing violence at home and abroad.

Expressing disappointment at the results, the group nevertheless said it had expected defeat, blaming the current climate of insecurity and disarray in both Switzerland and around the world.

Twelve years ago, a similar referendum on scrapping the armed forces mustered 36 per cent support among voters and campaigners said yesterday they would continue their efforts.

Supporters of the referendum proposal had argued that the armed forces were an outdated institution and a "man's world where blind obedience and contempt of women still rules".

They had also questioned the nine billion Swiss francs (€6.4 billion) it costs to maintain the armed forces every year, arguing the resources could be better spent on non-military initiatives. - (AFP)

Thread from two days ago I ran before the vote was taken:

Swiss to Decide Army Issue (Socialists Want To Abolish Militia-AKA-All Citizens Armed,Free)


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: banglist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last
God Bless the Great Patriots of Switzerland and their Constitutional Repubvlic and their long-lasting citizen miltia!

This insane proposal which was pushed by the globalists/socialists anti-gun, disarmament scumbags was actually called: Switzerland Without An Army!

***Take note the Swiss also voted down a second Globalist intiative which would have placed their citizens in UN "peace-keeping" crap, and would have set-up an internal SS Gestapo to "protect" the citizens, instead of their citizens protecting themselves as they always have done so well with their citizen militia style army.

Remember to never give up your Constitutionly protected rights (and your duties as an American to be well-armed, well-informed and free) for false promises from the government of security via loss of rights

1 posted on 12/03/2001 4:51:52 PM PST by t-shirt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: archy; Lazamataz; lowbridge; copycat; sarcasm; B4Ranch; Mercuria; DoughtyOne; jeremiah...
December 3, 2001

Swiss Voters Reject Effort to Abolish Their Army By ELIZABETH OLSON

GENEVA, Dec. 2 — Swiss voters, turning aside arguments that their citizen army is outdated and unnecessary, today firmly rejected an effort to abolish the armed forces.

In a nationwide vote, one of several each year in which citizens decide many of the country's most pressing issues, Swiss voters also rebuffed a measure to impose a tax on capital gains. The vote leaves Switzerland and Greece the only two European countries that do not impose such a levy.

Only about 22 percent of voters favored ending the army. Voters also rejected a companion initiative to create a voluntary civilian peace corps.

This was the second time in 12 years that voters have been asked to decide whether to abolish the citizen army, in which nearly all the country's able-bodied men serve. The army has enjoyed a near mythic status as the invincible force that protected Switzerland from invasion.

A coalition called Switzerland Without an Army, which collected the required 100,000 signatures to bring about a vote, contends that since the end of the cold war, the justification for Swiss forces as a bulwark against invasion has disappeared. The landlocked country is surrounded by friendly nations and faces no threat, the group says.

The government had urged voters to reject the initiative.

Although the campaign was low- key, it is likely that the events of Sept. 11 shaped the outcome.

Since then, Switzerland has undergone a series of catastrophes — its worst mass killing, the abrupt bankruptcy of its national air carrier, a severe accident in a major Alpine tunnel and a serious airliner crash. Those events have put people on edge and have apparently stiffened resistance to making changes, especially one that would have ended one of Switzerland's most cherished institutions.

The army is viewed not only as a social leveler but also as a means of unifying a country with three cultures and four languages.

A similar proposal in 1989 to jettison Switzerland's armed force garnered support from a third of those voting, prompting an overhaul of the army, which is still under way. The current force of about 350,000 soldiers, mostly reservists, is being reduced by almost half.

While Switzerland is officially neutral, it contributes troops to peacekeeping missions.

A truer test of Swiss sentiment on the country's place in the world will occur in March when voters decide whether to join the United Nations. While the Swiss provide troops to certain United Nations missions, like the one in Kosovo, and the organization's European headquarters is in Geneva, Switzerland has never joined the organization.

The capital gains tax, which had been favored by trade unions, was opposed by the government and by businesses. They contended that such a tax would amount to double taxation because Switzerland already has a wealth tax.

Voters, however, agreed to another government-endorsed measure — to put a ceiling on state debt, requiring the government to amass surpluses in boom years to offset deficits in leaner years.

2 posted on 12/03/2001 4:55:12 PM PST by t-shirt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: t-shirt
Voters reject move to end armed forces

Items compiled from Chicago Tribune news services

Published December 3, 2001

GENEVA, SWITZERLAND -- Swiss voters Sunday overwhelmingly rejected a proposal to scrap the armed forces, cherished by many as vital protection for the small, long-neutral Alpine country in the heart of Europe.

Only 384,991 people, or 21.9 percent of those participating, voted in favor of the initiative.

The proposal was put forward by a coalition called Switzerland Without an Army under a law that allows anyone to force a referendum by collecting 100,000 signatures from voters.

"The lack of security following the Sept. 11 attacks made it difficult to conduct a reasoned discussion of defense policy," said Jo Lang, spokesman for the coalition.

3 posted on 12/03/2001 4:56:40 PM PST by t-shirt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: t-shirt
Some 78 per cent of Swiss voters disagreed, also rejecting a second initiative by the group to establish a voluntary civilian peace corps aimed at defusing violence at home and abroad.

Nice to see that there are others in the world that don't particularly care for tyranny.

4 posted on 12/03/2001 4:57:55 PM PST by Centurion2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: t-shirt
Cool.
6 posted on 12/03/2001 4:58:31 PM PST by billybudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: t-shirt
They want to hang on to their weapons in case someone tries to force the Euro on them.
7 posted on 12/03/2001 5:01:48 PM PST by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: t-shirt
It seems the Swiss are voting for another 500 years of independence and freedom!
8 posted on 12/03/2001 5:03:10 PM PST by Gritty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: t-shirt
"The lack of security following the Sept. 11 attacks made it difficult to conduct a reasoned discussion of defense policy,"...

The Sept. 11 attacks blew their position out of the water so, lacking anything of merit to say, they went ballistic and shouted and screamed. Most of Switzerland just watched and shook their heads.

9 posted on 12/03/2001 5:06:04 PM PST by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: t-shirt
"The lack of security following the Sept. 11 attacks made it difficult to conduct a reasoned discussion of defense policy," said Jo Lang, spokesman for the coalition.

On the contrary; the events of 9/11 reinforced the necessity of an armed citizenry. Leftists are so twisted sometimes.

10 posted on 12/03/2001 5:06:39 PM PST by meyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: t-shirt
There is no logic for these anti-gun, anti-militia groups to keep bringing these issues up, unless there is an underlying and very destructive reason. When you check into the background of any of them I bet you find globalist marxists, like the instigator of the MMM's.
11 posted on 12/03/2001 5:08:21 PM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: t-shirt
Good for them.
12 posted on 12/03/2001 5:09:37 PM PST by vladog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: t-shirt
Lets see... 12 years ago it was 36% for, 64% against.

Now, 12 years later, its 22% for, 78% against.

And they want to keep trying?!!! I predict it will be 8% for, and 92% against, 12 years from now.

Whats the term for doing the same thing over and over again, but expecting a different result?

14 posted on 12/03/2001 5:16:32 PM PST by Frohickey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: t-shirt
the country does not face any military threat.

It never seems to occur to the "Switzerland Without An Army group" idiots just exactly why that is, does it?

I'll ask again: What is it about otherwise intelligent utopians that make them so paralyzingly stupid?

15 posted on 12/03/2001 5:17:56 PM PST by Marauder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frohickey
Whats the term for doing the same thing over and over again, but expecting a different result?

A liberal?

16 posted on 12/03/2001 5:25:53 PM PST by JenB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: t-shirt
Do they have Elk in Switzerland? It ma be time to move...
17 posted on 12/03/2001 5:27:31 PM PST by MileHi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: t-shirt
1989: 34% yes. 2001: 22% yes. I like this trend!
18 posted on 12/03/2001 5:34:05 PM PST by N00dleN0gg1n
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JenB
Yes, but the cliche that I've heard is that this is the definition of insanity. Oh, wait, you said that. Sorry, my mistake.
19 posted on 12/03/2001 5:34:11 PM PST by absalom01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: t-shirt
Thanks for the bump. The people foil the elitist do-gooders!! Long live the people.
20 posted on 12/03/2001 5:38:14 PM PST by copycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson