Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Anti-American Textbooks Have No Place in Texas Schools
Allen (TX) American (website text not available) ^ | December 1-2, 2001 | Bill Ames

Posted on 12/05/2001 1:34:13 PM PST by Conservative

"Some people think we need a world government to deal with the many complex issues confronting human society."

"Scriptural instruction to be good stewards of the Creation have thus far not moderated Christian ruthlessness towards our environment."

"Some scholars believe that the spread of Democracy, which put land ownership and wealth in the hands of many, and the Industrial Revolution, which made mass production of goods possible and spread wealth throughout society, are the root of the environmental crisis."

Are these passages from some Marxist doctrine, published in a third-world country, and used to indoctrinate its citizens to hate American values?

No, these words appear in a textbook proposed for Texas public schools, part of an ideological tirade presented in Environmental Science, Creating a Sustainable Future, by Daniel D. Chiras, and published by Jones and Bartlett.

Add "Crisis of unsustainability", "species 'rights'", "human biological imperialism", "Spaceship Earth in trouble" and other unscientific, biased terminology.

This is neither science nor education. Rather, it is radical propaganda.

It is hard to understand how this textbook got by the staff reviewers of the Texas Education Agency's bureaucracy. After all, the TEA operates under Texas code which requires public school curriculum to be factual, and promote patriotism and the free enterprise system.

The Jones and Bartlett text does none of these, and in fact shows a biased rejection of Christianity and our Capitalist free-market system, as well as a loathing for our system of government. This text is just more Malthusian junk science from the radical left, not about saving the Earth, but rather an ideological attempt to convince our kids that the socialists in the United Nations should be allowed to distribute America's wealth across the world according to their agenda. Today it is fashionable to frighten children with global warming, melting ice caps, and flooding coastlines. But these are the same radicals, who on the inaugural Earth Day in the 1970s, used a supposedly imminent ice age to promote an identical agenda. And these are the same folks who predicted that 65 million citizens of an overpopulated America would die of starvation between 1980-1989.

Thankfully, this textbook was finally rejected by ten courageous Republican members of the Texas State Board of Education.

And how some Democrats on the Board have protested this decision, along with their comrades: Radical environmentalists and the unelected eletists of the education establishment.

Democrat board member Mary Helen Berlanga of Corpus Christi started the ball rolling by claiming that the Board's rejection amounted to "censorship". Editorials and letters to editors around the state have picked up on this theme.

Ms. Berlanga and her followers need to recognize that, while ideologues such as the authors of the offending text have every right to write and even publish whatever suits them, they do not have the right to reject Texas code while poisoning the minds of public school children.

This text is clearly an attempt to indoctrinate our children with an anti-American, anti-Christian set of values, without presenting the other side of the debate.

The authors even admit their attempt to change values. On page 41 they write, "Changes in values are also essential. Many observers believe that creating a sustainable society (society....not environment....a giant leap from "science" here), will require profound changes in our understanding of issues, through education (read...indoctrination).".

Current performance of education administrators has clearly established that public schools are not the place to teach values. A major problem that parents face today stems from the moral relativism, political correctness, and contempt for family values pushed so hard in many of today's public schools. Administrators need to focus on academics, an area so in need of significant improvement that it warrants 100% of their attention, while leaving the teaching of values to families and their religious institutions.

Bill Ames is a freelance writer who lives in Dallas. He welcomes reader comments at billames@prodigy.net


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
The rejection of this textbook is a major win for Conservatives against the atni-America enviro activists.

Dozens of Conservatives presented their issues to the Texas State Board of Education on September 6 and November 8.

Since Texas (with California) is the leading purchaser of public school textbooks in the country, and therefore often sets the tone for other states' evaluations, the rejection of this biased textbook has national implications as well.

1 posted on 12/05/2001 1:34:13 PM PST by Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: diotima
You might find this interesting. I know you're busy right now. ~Boxsford
2 posted on 12/05/2001 1:40:08 PM PST by Boxsford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
YE-HAW!!!


3 posted on 12/05/2001 1:42:36 PM PST by Texaggie79
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative
Since Texas (with California) is the leading purchaser of public school textbooks in the country, and therefore often sets the tone for other states' evaluations, the rejection of this biased textbook has national implications as well.

Most publishers of textbooks will scrap plans for a book that Texas will not buy. That pesky "free-enterprise" system means they won't make any money just selling a book to other states.

4 posted on 12/05/2001 1:43:20 PM PST by Texican72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative
I just wish that more parents would take some time between racing their kids to soccer games to discover out the crap that's being taught to their kids.

The rainbow-enviro-leftists have thrown the cat in the well a long time ago and it's going to be quite a task removing their putrid filth.

5 posted on 12/05/2001 1:43:24 PM PST by AAABEST
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative
America is anti-American anymore. Do you think corporate monopolies and conglomerates are pro-American?
6 posted on 12/05/2001 1:43:35 PM PST by mxbluto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mxbluto
America is anti-American anymore. Do you think corporate monopolies and conglomerates are pro-American?

Off topic. If you want to bash Capitalism, start your own thread or go to DemocRATunderground.com

7 posted on 12/05/2001 2:11:11 PM PST by Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Conservative
bump
8 posted on 12/05/2001 2:28:11 PM PST by Red Jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative
Democrat board member Mary Helen Berlanga of Corpus Christi started the ball rolling by claiming that the Board's rejection amounted to "censorship". Editorials and letters to editors around the state have picked up on this theme.
"Censorship?" Well, yes, that is the point. You wouldn't expect to have "adult" videos shown in government schools, and you shouldn't expect to find anticonservative material there, either.
9 posted on 12/05/2001 2:33:41 PM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Forgive me for interrupting your very important thoughts and profound wisdom, but we are in the midst of the most exciting fundraiser ever on FreeRepublic. I would hate for any of you to miss it!

Come visit us at Freepathon Holidays are Here Again: Let's Really Light Our Tree This Year - Thread 6

and be a part of something that is larger than all of us.

Alone, we are a voice crying in the wilderness. Together we are a force for positive action!

Don't be left out!

Be one who can someday say..................... "I was there when..................."

Thank you to everyone who has already come by and become a part!

10 posted on 12/05/2001 2:35:13 PM PST by 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mxbluto
A private "monopoly" cannot force you to use its products, unlike government monopolies. Take your capitalism hatred elsewhere.
11 posted on 12/05/2001 2:36:21 PM PST by billybudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mxbluto
Corporate monopolies? You mean like Robert Morris's Bank of North America? Or Alexander Hamilton's Bank of the United States? I'm sure you don't mean Cornelius Vanderbilt's Harlem Railroad. Oh, those were all prior to 1840. Were all those people "anti-American" too? What about Albert Gallatin, who wanted to build public roads with tax money, or Alexander Hamilton, who created the 1st Bank of the United States, or Thomas Jefferson who prohibited American farmers from trading with France? Were they all "anti-American?"

You are so far out in left field that I don't think even "www.commies.com" can accomodate you.

12 posted on 12/05/2001 3:07:03 PM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: basil; Gracey; The Bat Lady; groundhog
ping
13 posted on 12/06/2001 11:01:31 AM PST by DrewsDad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson