Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

AT&T broadband users frustrated
MSNBC ^ | 12/8/01 | Rachel Konrad

Posted on 12/08/2001 6:59:37 PM PST by LibWhacker

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

1 posted on 12/08/2001 6:59:37 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
AT&T here in Corona, CA (formally mediaone.net) working like a champ, no diff in speed, was only down 1 day.
2 posted on 12/08/2001 7:09:53 PM PST by cd jones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
128K is what I get on my ISDN line (I'm in a small town and DSL and cable modems aren't available).
3 posted on 12/08/2001 7:10:43 PM PST by Bubba_Leroy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
I'm willing to give AT&T the benefit of the doubt for now. They just got their new network on-line and I don't expect everything to be perfect right out of the gate. But AT&T better be hot on the trail of some solutions. If I don't see improvement pretty soon, I'll consider jumping over to another service.
4 posted on 12/08/2001 7:12:28 PM PST by Hillary 666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
AT&T in Chicago's West & North Suburbs... in a word: disaster.

Their consumer-realtions is embarassing... really, really bad....

5 posted on 12/08/2001 7:19:33 PM PST by IncPen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
Sounds like a good opportunity to allow free market competition take care of itself...
6 posted on 12/08/2001 7:23:20 PM PST by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IncPen; Hillary 666; Bubba_Leroy; cd jones
Here's a real interesting excerpt from another article (http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/12/05/BU129831.DTL&type=tech) on the fiasco:

McNutt said creditors are looking into whether they can sue AT&T and other cable operators for draining money from the company by forcing ExciteAtHome to sign unprofitable contracts with cable operators. The cable companies set up ExciteAtHome and controlled the board of directors. AT&T owns three-quarters of ExciteAtHome's voting stock.

Looks like AT&T was up to its eyebrows in the scheme to force Excite@Home into bankruptcy so they could pick up the company for peanuts (not that Excite isn't blameless!). Some way to treat your customers, is all I've got to say.

7 posted on 12/08/2001 7:30:13 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: The Duke
Pinging that last comment to you because it may have looked like I was ignoring you. But I wasn't. I was cutting and pasting, editing and formatting! :-)
8 posted on 12/08/2001 7:35:49 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: The Duke
Sounds like a good opportunity to allow free market competition take care of itself...

That's what I'm thinking. If somebody can give me the services that AT&T is claiming they can at a decent price, I'll take a good hard look. This is a great opportunity for AT&T to step up and fix their problems or let their customers leave to someone who can.

9 posted on 12/08/2001 7:39:40 PM PST by Hillary 666
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
I'm still @home. Will be until February I guess, then will be migrated to another service.
10 posted on 12/08/2001 7:40:05 PM PST by SoDak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
I was with @home now with AT&T in Arlington, Texas....the change over was smooth, down about 24 hours. Have not had one minute of trouble and the speed is as fast as before.
11 posted on 12/08/2001 7:44:02 PM PST by engrpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
640kb/s w/ DSL (qwest). Had it 6 months. Not one bit of trouble, knock on wood.

$30/month for 24/7 service. I'd pay twice that without even thinking about it.

12 posted on 12/08/2001 7:45:26 PM PST by tjg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
   Connection Type      Connection Speed Faster Providers
  28.8 Kbps    Dial-up 28.8k  
  33.6 Kbps    Dial-up 33.6k  
  53.3 Kbps    Dial-up 56k  
  64 Kbps    ISDN 64k  
  83.1 Kbps     83.1 kbps
  128 Kbps    ISDN 128k   New York Internet
  384 Kbps    DSL 384k   New York Internet
  768 Kbps    DSL 768k   DIRECTV DSL™
  1500 Kbps    DSL 1.5MB   EarthLink Inc.

As you can see, at 83.1 Kbps, I'm no where near where I should be using AT&T Broadband. It is frustrating, but on the upside, I'm not getting anything near the number of attampts on my firewall that I got with @Home.

13 posted on 12/08/2001 7:47:26 PM PST by TopDog2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: cdwright
Ha, wrong. Porn built the internet.
15 posted on 12/08/2001 7:51:25 PM PST by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: LibWhacker
There was a hokey movie -- with a very pithy (and quite tinfoilesque) plot line -- made in the late '60s or early '70s called "The President's Analyst". I won't spoil the plot, since it's worth renting to watch, but I will mention something that sprang to mind when I read that article.

In the movie, James Coburn is talking with Omar Shariff (playing the part of a spy), who tells him that he's been in countless countries across the world, all completely different from each other, but in every country he'd ever been in, there was one thing they all had in common. Everyone, he said, in every country in the world, hates the phone company.

16 posted on 12/08/2001 7:53:31 PM PST by Don Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #17 Removed by Moderator

To: Bubba_Leroy
I just tested the AT&T cable speed at http://bandwidthplace.com/speedtest/

My speed is 46.8k, slower than a 56k modem. I'm paying $50+/month for this.

18 posted on 12/08/2001 7:59:22 PM PST by Reeses
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: cdwright
"Porn built the internet."

And porn will probably take it down.

This will be amusing -- perhaps you can diagram how that will come about -- leaving aside your Old Testament Biblical wrath visions -- let's just keep it to reality.

19 posted on 12/08/2001 8:03:36 PM PST by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TopDog2
My AT&T in Mpls/StPaul area is about 800k down -- pretty typical. I can get local server content at about 1.4M.
20 posted on 12/08/2001 8:05:26 PM PST by jlogajan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson