Skip to comments.
AT&T broadband users frustrated
MSNBC ^
| 12/8/01
| Rachel Konrad
Posted on 12/08/2001 6:59:37 PM PST by LibWhacker
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
To: LibWhacker
AT&T here in Corona, CA (formally mediaone.net) working like a champ, no diff in speed, was only down 1 day.
2
posted on
12/08/2001 7:09:53 PM PST
by
cd jones
To: LibWhacker
128K is what I get on my ISDN line (I'm in a small town and DSL and cable modems aren't available).
To: LibWhacker
I'm willing to give AT&T the benefit of the doubt for now. They just got their new network on-line and I don't expect everything to be perfect right out of the gate. But AT&T better be hot on the trail of some solutions. If I don't see improvement pretty soon, I'll consider jumping over to another service.
To: LibWhacker
AT&T in Chicago's West & North Suburbs... in a word: disaster.
Their consumer-realtions is embarassing... really, really bad....
5
posted on
12/08/2001 7:19:33 PM PST
by
IncPen
To: LibWhacker
Sounds like a good opportunity to allow free market competition take care of itself...
6
posted on
12/08/2001 7:23:20 PM PST
by
The Duke
To: IncPen; Hillary 666; Bubba_Leroy; cd jones
Here's a real interesting excerpt from another article (
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/12/05/BU129831.DTL&type=tech) on the fiasco:
McNutt said creditors are looking into whether they can sue AT&T and other cable operators for draining money from the company by forcing ExciteAtHome to sign unprofitable contracts with cable operators. The cable companies set up ExciteAtHome and controlled the board of directors. AT&T owns three-quarters of ExciteAtHome's voting stock.
Looks like AT&T was up to its eyebrows in the scheme to force Excite@Home into bankruptcy so they could pick up the company for peanuts (not that Excite isn't blameless!). Some way to treat your customers, is all I've got to say.
To: The Duke
Pinging that last comment to you because it may have looked like I was ignoring you. But I wasn't. I was cutting and pasting, editing and formatting! :-)
To: The Duke
Sounds like a good opportunity to allow free market competition take care of itself... That's what I'm thinking. If somebody can give me the services that AT&T is claiming they can at a decent price, I'll take a good hard look. This is a great opportunity for AT&T to step up and fix their problems or let their customers leave to someone who can.
To: LibWhacker
I'm still @home. Will be until February I guess, then will be migrated to another service.
10
posted on
12/08/2001 7:40:05 PM PST
by
SoDak
To: LibWhacker
I was with @home now with AT&T in Arlington, Texas....the change over was smooth, down about 24 hours. Have not had one minute of trouble and the speed is as fast as before.
11
posted on
12/08/2001 7:44:02 PM PST
by
engrpat
To: LibWhacker
640kb/s w/ DSL (qwest). Had it 6 months. Not one bit of trouble, knock on wood.
$30/month for 24/7 service. I'd pay twice that without even thinking about it.
12
posted on
12/08/2001 7:45:26 PM PST
by
tjg
To: LibWhacker
As you can see, at 83.1 Kbps, I'm no where near where I should be using AT&T Broadband. It is frustrating, but on the upside, I'm not getting anything near the number of attampts on my firewall that I got with @Home.
13
posted on
12/08/2001 7:47:26 PM PST
by
TopDog2
Comment #14 Removed by Moderator
To: cdwright
Ha, wrong. Porn built the internet.
15
posted on
12/08/2001 7:51:25 PM PST
by
jlogajan
To: LibWhacker
There was a hokey movie -- with a very pithy (and quite tinfoilesque) plot line -- made in the late '60s or early '70s called "The President's Analyst". I won't spoil the plot, since it's worth renting to watch, but I will mention something that sprang to mind when I read that article.
In the movie, James Coburn is talking with Omar Shariff (playing the part of a spy), who tells him that he's been in countless countries across the world, all completely different from each other, but in every country he'd ever been in, there was one thing they all had in common. Everyone, he said, in every country in the world, hates the phone company.
16
posted on
12/08/2001 7:53:31 PM PST
by
Don Joe
Comment #17 Removed by Moderator
To: Bubba_Leroy
I just tested the AT&T cable speed at http://bandwidthplace.com/speedtest/
My speed is 46.8k, slower than a 56k modem. I'm paying $50+/month for this.
18
posted on
12/08/2001 7:59:22 PM PST
by
Reeses
To: cdwright
"Porn built the internet." And porn will probably take it down.
This will be amusing -- perhaps you can diagram how that will come about -- leaving aside your Old Testament Biblical wrath visions -- let's just keep it to reality.
19
posted on
12/08/2001 8:03:36 PM PST
by
jlogajan
To: TopDog2
My AT&T in Mpls/StPaul area is about 800k down -- pretty typical. I can get local server content at about 1.4M.
20
posted on
12/08/2001 8:05:26 PM PST
by
jlogajan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson