Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: IncPen; Hillary 666; Bubba_Leroy; cd jones
Here's a real interesting excerpt from another article (http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2001/12/05/BU129831.DTL&type=tech) on the fiasco:

McNutt said creditors are looking into whether they can sue AT&T and other cable operators for draining money from the company by forcing ExciteAtHome to sign unprofitable contracts with cable operators. The cable companies set up ExciteAtHome and controlled the board of directors. AT&T owns three-quarters of ExciteAtHome's voting stock.

Looks like AT&T was up to its eyebrows in the scheme to force Excite@Home into bankruptcy so they could pick up the company for peanuts (not that Excite isn't blameless!). Some way to treat your customers, is all I've got to say.

7 posted on 12/08/2001 7:30:13 PM PST by LibWhacker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: LibWhacker
Looks like AT&T was up to its eyebrows in the scheme to force Excite@Home into bankruptcy so they could pick up the company for peanuts (not that Excite isn't blameless!). Some way to treat your customers, is all I've got to say.

ATT owned 30 or 40 % of excite and stacked the board with their cronies. Welfare for lawyers for years to come. WHAT A COUNTRY

21 posted on 12/08/2001 8:06:32 PM PST by tubebender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson