Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

FEC Sued Over Alleged Hillary Campaign Fraud
NewsMax ^ | December 11, 2001 | Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff

Posted on 12/11/2001 11:09:11 AM PST by MeekOneGOP

NewsMax.com: Article Archives

NewsMax.com

 

Tuesday Dec. 11, 2001; 3:01 p.m. EST

FEC Sued Over Alleged Hillary Campaign Fraud

It's been five months since Hollywood producer Peter Paul filed a complaint with the Federal Election Commission against New York Senator Hillary Clinton alleging that she failed to report most of the $2 million he donated to the "Hillary 2000" Senate campaign.

Paul has cancelled checks and other records to back up his claims, including thank you notes from the former first family. Yet the FEC has so far failed to act.

On Friday lawyers for Judicial Watch, which represents Mr. Paul in the case, filed suit against the supposed watchdog agency, pointing out that Paul's complaint is now well past the 120-day statutory deadline within which the FEC is supposed to act.

Meanwhile the Bush Justice Department has instead indicted Paul for alleged stock fraud, underscoring the double standard that continues to allow the Clinton family to escape Justice while most others are held accountable.

"The FEC has abundant evidence that Hillary Clinton and her campaign for Senate engaged in massive election fraud, yet it has not taken any action," said Judicial Watch chairman Larry Klayman. "It is time for the FEC to stop protecting politicians and hold them accountable when they violate the campaign finance laws."

The case has been assigned to Judge Royce Lamberth, who's developed a reputation over the years as one of the few judges in Washington, D.C. interested in enforcing the law for everyone.

Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:

Sen. Hillary Clinton


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: clintonscandals; hillary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-260 next last
To: bayourod
Have you seen any cancelled checks?

The article states he has the cancelled checks.

As for credibility, I'll believe the twice-convicted felon over Hillary Rodham Clinton any day.

Bayourod, Do you work for Hillary or the Democrats?

21 posted on 01/23/2002 10:55:32 AM PST by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: RJL
I have cancelled chwcks too. That doesn't mean that Hillary is guilty of whatever I decide to accuse her.

Why have none of these checks been shown to the public?

NewsMax is a shill for Judicial Watch. They reprint JW's press releases without regard to the truthfulness of the facts alleged. There must be a common benefactor.

22 posted on 01/23/2002 12:14:56 PM PST by bayourod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: bayourod
bttt
23 posted on 01/23/2002 7:13:29 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
bttt
24 posted on 01/24/2002 8:44:39 AM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: staytrue
bump
25 posted on 01/25/2002 9:05:27 AM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Patrick
bump
26 posted on 01/25/2002 9:05:49 AM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Digger
bttt
27 posted on 01/25/2002 9:06:26 AM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Digger
bttt
28 posted on 01/25/2002 6:30:45 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NC Conservative
bump
29 posted on 01/25/2002 10:20:38 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Digger
bump
30 posted on 01/26/2002 10:44:18 AM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bayourod
bump
31 posted on 01/26/2002 10:46:22 AM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: timestax
bump
32 posted on 01/26/2002 10:46:37 AM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: deport
bttt
33 posted on 01/28/2002 7:39:40 AM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: timestax
bttt
34 posted on 01/28/2002 7:44:25 AM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: timestax
bttt
35 posted on 01/28/2002 9:30:44 AM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: timestax
bump
36 posted on 01/28/2002 2:24:41 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: timestax
bump to the top please!!
37 posted on 01/28/2002 7:03:09 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: timestax
bump to the top please!!
38 posted on 01/28/2002 7:03:58 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: timestax
bttt
39 posted on 01/28/2002 7:07:39 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
bttt
40 posted on 01/28/2002 7:51:24 PM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 241-260 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson