[Rob45and2]

Dosen't sound frivolous to me. Sounds kinda simple. He has the canceled checks from the donations that are not listed with the FEC. Clinton only needs to show the reason why they wern't claimed on her report to the FEC. She now has had 120 days to do that. She should give her explanation and that takes it off the table.. Providing she has an explanation..... If she dosen't then it gets kinda complicated.....

[staytrue]

Hillary's campaign also listed a 50K contribution from the American Muslim association as a contribution from the American Museum association. After the "error" was discovered, the campaign "returned" (or at least they said they were going to return the money) the money due to pressure from some jewish groups.

[deport]

.......Clinton only needs to show the reason why they wern't claimed on her report to the FEC. She now has had 120 days to do that. .......

The action isn't against Clinton but rather the FEC and their failure to persue within 120 days..... The real question is what reciepts/statements did Paul issue to the campaign and the Democrat party senate campaign fund regarding whom the donations in kind were far. It could get interesting if he has some other documentation

[bayourod]

"He has the canceled checks from the donations that are not listed with the FEC. "

Have you seen any cancelled checks? Do you even know what an in-kind contribution is? What you should ask to see is the report of in-kind expenditures that Peter Paul filed with the Hillary Campaign. But you will never see that because it doesn't exist.

If Peter Paul produces a cancelled check for $500 for carpet cleaning in his house is that proof that Hillary committed a crime??? Klayman is a fraud and so is this lawsuit. Grow up.

[timestax]

bump

[timestax]

bump

[gore3000]

Seems to me it's kinda hard to forget 2 million dollars.

BTW - why do we have campaign finance laws and are writing more when they are not enforced?

[timestax]

bump