Skip to comments.
PAPER: CLINTON HAD THREE CHANCES TO SEIZE BIN LADEN
Drudge ^
| 01-05-02
| unknown as of yet
Posted on 01/05/2002 3:03:03 PM PST by Cuban123
breaking on drudge....
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-108 next last
1
posted on
01/05/2002 3:03:04 PM PST
by
Cuban123
To: Cuban123
President Bill Clinton turned down at least three offers involving foreign governments to help seize Osama Bin Laden after he was identified as a terrorist who was threatening America, the SUNDAY TIMES of London is planning to report... MORE...
2
posted on
01/05/2002 3:03:54 PM PST
by
finnman69
To: Cuban123
so this is news? if clinton had bin ladin he would not have known what to do with him. they guy was the most incompetent President I can remember.Now that I have vented i feel better.
To: finnman69
If they had caught Osama Bin Laden he would not have anyone to fire missles at after he got charged with perjury.
To: finnman69
5
posted on
01/05/2002 3:07:46 PM PST
by
dstalley
To: Cuban123
Clinton's criminal negligence killed thousands
To: Cuban123
7
posted on
01/05/2002 3:14:07 PM PST
by
Pokey78
To: lexington minuteman 1775
The only things Bill Clinton cared about seizing were power, money, and a piece of slutty tail.
To: Lexington Green
Time for hearings,, hammer time!
To: Lexington Green
So who wants to bet whether any American papers (or broadcast media) pick up on this story?
To: Lexington Green
I know! I'm looking for a prime opportunity to FReep the creep, to tell him just that. I plan to have a sign that will read: "You Should Have Taken Action Against Terrorism, Not Polls."
You know, until 9/11 I thought that impeachment, sex with interns, redefining common words such as "is" and "alone," and perjury were going to be his legacy. But now it's much, much worse.
The only question remaining about his vaunted "legacy" is whether it was negligence or an unwillingness to be a leader that led to 9/11.
Comment #12 Removed by Moderator
Comment #13 Removed by Moderator
To: Cuban123
The clintons were too busy with their war on the RIGHT-WING to worry about threats to America.
They need to be tried, jailed and executed.
14
posted on
01/05/2002 3:21:40 PM PST
by
Bullish
To: Cuban123
When and IF this gets out, Bill will just blame his lack of action on impeachment procedeings. Bill knows how to play the blame game, he will pull something out his a*s and there will be no shortage of people to back him up.
15
posted on
01/05/2002 3:22:18 PM PST
by
Husker24
To: Cuban123
I smell LEGACY!
I think when history looks back from a perspective of 50 years or so, the '90s are going to make the '20s look rational.
16
posted on
01/05/2002 3:22:53 PM PST
by
Timesink
To: Cuban123
When you suck it's good to have someone close by that sucks even worse to make you look better. Osama Bin Laden was Bill Clinton's sucker.
Next to Monica, of course....;>)
17
posted on
01/05/2002 3:22:58 PM PST
by
randog
To: NYC GOP Chick
The answer to you last question is BOTH.
By the way, is it lonely being a NYC GOP Chick? I mean that only in the context of GOP in a town with a 7-1 Rat to Pub ratio.
To: Cuban123
I had heard rumors that the Sunday London Times was going to break this story.
19
posted on
01/05/2002 3:23:58 PM PST
by
mware
To: Husker24
will just blame his lack of action on impeachment procedeings this may have already happened
20
posted on
01/05/2002 3:25:09 PM PST
by
alrea
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-108 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson