[Dane]

Another yawwwwwwn, excuse me. I see you all lost the arguemnet since there hasn't been a coherent response to reply #108 and you all are turning this into a bash Dane thread.

I really could care less, just informing lurkers at losers tactics.

[wienerdog.com]

As I said in post #110:

You are going to say you won this argument, which is fine, if that gives you a woody. I would rather have you sitting in front of a computer than running around loose.

I'm surprised it took so long.

[riley1992]

I was never flagged to #108, Dane. If you want me to respond to something, flag me to it. Aside from that, you really can't blame us for turing this into a Bash Dane thread. You interject your nonsense into any and every thread that has virtually nothing to do with drugs or Libertarians. You have raised the whole Bashing Dane sport to a whole new level all on your own.

[Eddeche]

Aw, cmon Dane. Don't take the ball and go home.

If I saw a bum on the street in front of my house shooting up I would call the cops.

But what is the point here ?

[dead]

I answered your lame dopey question, and you ignored my response, as well as my counter-question.

Run along now. It's getting a little hot in the kitchen.

[tacticalogic]

You've been answered, Dane. You invite the abuse when you throw in ignorant crap like the "anytime, anywhere" comments. Measured, rational debate is nearly impossible when everything is expressed in absolutes. You're insistence on injecting them into the discussion seems to be little more than an attempt at disruption. You wouldn't want to do that, would you?