Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DVD hacker Johansen indicted in Norway
The Register ^ | 1/10/02 | Ann Harrison

Posted on 01/10/2002 12:17:07 PM PST by veronica

Norwegian prosecutors have indicted Jon Johansen for his role in creating the DeCSS program that unlocked a DVD copy protection system and unleashed a series of lawsuits by the motion picture industry.

The National Authority for Investigation and Prosecution of Economic and Environmental Crime in Norway (OKOKRIM) indicted Johansen on January 9th for violating Norwegian criminal code section 145(2), which prohibits the opening of a closed document in a way that gains access to its contents, or breaking into a locked repository. The law also prohibits the breaking of a protective device in a way that unlawfully obtains access to the data.

If Johansen is found to have committed the felony for the purpose of unlawful gain, he could serve up to two years in prison. "The way we understand it, the data is the content of the DVD, what you are breaking is the encryption and what you are getting access to is the data on the disk," said Halvor Manshaus of the Oslo law firm Schjodt, which is representing Johansen.

Manshaus says the law has previously been used to prosecute those who broke into bank or phone company records. But he says this is the first time that the law has been used to prosecute someone who broke an encryption system. The case is expected to go to trial before summer.

"There was a Norwegian Supreme Court ruling where this regulation has beenapplied before, but that was a case where he was accessing or breaking into a system that you are not legally entitled to access," said Manshaus. "The distinction here is that he is charged with breaking a code and accessing the data that he is allowed to access. He owned the DVD disk."

The indictment comes more than two years after the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) contacted OKOKRIM prosecutors and requested a criminal investigation of Johansen and his father, Per, who owned the PC on which Johansen posted DeCSS.

Indictment follows US lawsuits

Manshaus says the MPAA also asked OKOKRIM to charge both father and son with contributory copyright infringement. OKOKRIM did not pursue this charge against Jon Johansen, and Per Johansen has not been charged under either complaint.

Neither father, nor son is accused of breaking any U.S. laws. Johansen, who just turned 18, was not available for comment. The movie industry fears that the removal of the DVD encryption could spark unauthorized copying of DVD movies.

But Johansen has maintained that DeCSS was intended not to make copies, but rather to create DVD playback software for computers running the Linux operating system. Johansen is co-founder of a group called MoRE (Masters of Reverse Engineering).

Two members of the group, which Johansen knew only by their screen names, helped him develop DeCSS in 1999. The group found that the Windows-based DVD player XingDVD from Xing Technology Corp. had not hidden its decryption key. MoRE used this decryption key to make DeCSS.

Manshaus says Johansen never used the utility to make copies of DVDs.

Jan Bing, a Norwegian legal expert who testified for the EFF in a related California civil case, concluded in a legal analysis that, "there is no legal precedent or court decision in Norway to support a claim that reverse engineering is a violation of Norwegian criminal law." He added that 145(2) could, in theory, forbid the "breaking of a protective device," to gain access to information on a disk, but he noted that there is no supporting Norwegian precedent.

A spokesmen for the MPAA was not immediately available for comment on the indictment. Robin Gross, a staff attorney with the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) that has supported Johansen said the motion picture industry has pushed Norwegian prosecutors to indict the young programmer. "I think they just finally succumbed to Hollywood pressure," said Gross.

"The Norwegian government finally had to bow to the demands of Hollywood to prosecute Jon."

In January, 2000, police entered Johansen's home and seized two personal computers, a mobile phone, and several computer disks. Johansen was taken to a police station and questioned for nearly seven hours and released.

Gross says the current action against Johansen stems from two lawsuits filed in the U.S. The first lawsuit, was brought in 1999 by the DVD Copyright Control Association (DVD CCA) in California Superior Court, against Andrew Bunner and others. The suit claimed that Web publishers who posted or linked to DeCSS unlawfully misappropriated trade secrets. The suit demanded that the publishers delete the information. While he was not named in the suit, Jon Johansen decided to remove his link to DeCSS from his web site.

On November 1, 2001, the California Court of Appeals reversed the court's preliminary injunction and confirmed that the publication of DeCSS is protected by the First Amendment. Bunner and his legal team have asked the court to recognize that because DeCSS is widely available on the Internet, it cannot be considered a trade secret.

The second case involved a federal suit in New York court against 2600 Magazine which posted the DeCSS code on its Web site. The major movie studios sued 2600 Magazine, claiming that the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) bans publication of the program.

On November 30, 2001, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a lower court decision banning the magazine from publishing DeCSS. The court agreed that computer programs are protected expression. But it found that when DeCSS is published on the Internet, the fact that it could be misused justified a complete ban on the program.

Despite the lawsuits, Gross says that Johansen, who now works for a software company, is respected in Norway. She notes that he was awarded Norway's Karoline Prize given each year to a Norwegian student who receives top grades and makes a contribution to society. Gross says the EFF plans to coordinate protests and a letter-writing campaign similar to that which lobbied for the release of Russian programmer Dmitry Sklyarov.

Sklyarov was jailed and later released for distributing software that could be used to circumvent access restrictions on Adobe's e-book format.

"We want to get the Norwegian public to come together and put some political pressure on the prosecutors to drop the charges against Johansen," said Gross. ©


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

1 posted on 01/10/2002 12:17:08 PM PST by veronica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: veronica
This the same guy who wrote DiVx:)
2 posted on 01/10/2002 12:18:25 PM PST by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RedBloodedAmerican
Mmmm.. DIVX :)
3 posted on 01/10/2002 12:37:53 PM PST by BrooklynGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: veronica
/* Usage is: cat title-key scrambled.vob | efdtt >clear.vob */

#define m(i)(x[i]^s[i+84])<< unsigned char x[5],y,s[2048];main(n){for(read(0,x,5);read(0,s,n=2048);write(1,s ,n))if(s[y=s[13]%8+20]/16%4==1){int i=m(1)17^256+m(0)8,k=m(2)0,j=m(4)17^m(3)9^k *2-k%8^8,a=0,c=26;for(s[y]-=16;--c;j*=2)a=a*2^i&1,i=i/2^j&1<<24;for(j=127;++jy)c+=y=i^i/8^i>>4^i>>12,i=i>>8^y<<17,a^=a>>14,y=a^a*8^a<<6,a=a>>8^y<<9,k=s [j],k="7Wo~'G_\216"[k&7]+2^"cr3sfw6v;*k+>/n."[k>>4]*2^k*257/8,s[j]=k^(k&k*2&34) *6^c+~y;}}

4 posted on 01/10/2002 12:41:05 PM PST by wooly_mammoth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

link
5 posted on 01/10/2002 12:42:38 PM PST by wooly_mammoth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BrooklynGOP;bush2000
If I am not mistaken you can get MS players to rip Divx' to .wmp format, no?
6 posted on 01/10/2002 12:44:00 PM PST by RedBloodedAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

code in Java
7 posted on 01/10/2002 12:45:15 PM PST by wooly_mammoth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

t-shirt with code in Perl

8 posted on 01/10/2002 12:48:23 PM PST by wooly_mammoth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: veronica
Do I need Johanson to transfer the audio of a DVD on to a CD-R? Is that encrypted? Cause my CD-R making program does not "see" the audio on the DVD.
9 posted on 01/10/2002 12:48:57 PM PST by abandon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abandon
You are asking the wrong person. (-:
10 posted on 01/10/2002 12:51:01 PM PST by veronica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

42 ways to distribute DeCSS
11 posted on 01/10/2002 12:56:12 PM PST by wooly_mammoth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: veronica
Good, it's about time somebody put this prick in prison.
12 posted on 01/10/2002 1:10:43 PM PST by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: toddhisattva
What the hell for? What do you have against fair use and free speech?

I have a problem with somebody intentionally subverting legitimate digital rights management -- and then releasing the code into the public domain. This code only has one purpose: Digital theft. It's not about free speech or fair use. You can wrap yourself in that flag but, frankly, you're full of crap if you do.
14 posted on 01/10/2002 5:45:50 PM PST by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
I guess the phrase 'ex post facto' is beyond your ken.

Not suprising considering your name.

L

15 posted on 01/10/2002 5:49:28 PM PST by Lurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
I guess the phrase 'ex post facto' is beyond your ken.

Not suprising considering your name.

L

16 posted on 01/10/2002 5:49:57 PM PST by Lurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
What, exactly, is retroactive about the prosecution?
17 posted on 01/10/2002 5:57:00 PM PST by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
The fact that reading the contents of a disk you purchased isn't illegal.

Also noteworthy is the fact that the indicted person isn't alleged to have made one single dime from his creation.

He just wanted to be able to play DVDs on a UNIX platform, so he wrote a program to do just that.

He didn't 'steal' anything. If you want to put him into prison because he invented something that could be used to steal, I guess you'll want the guy who invented the crowbar imprisoned next.

If they caught this guy pirating DVDs for profit, I would agree with you. But, they didn't.

Indicting this guy for theft makes about as much sense as indicting Sam Colt for inventing the revolver because people commit crimes with guns.

L

18 posted on 01/10/2002 6:11:15 PM PST by Lurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Bush2000
Here's an idea you can pass on to the motion picture multi-nationals: Don't release your inferior products to private consumers. Print them on 35 mm stock, as you had been doing for nearly 100% years, and ship those cans of film to motion picture theaters (which you own too nowadays!) Otherwise, if you sell me a DVD, a VCR tape or whatever, I'll do with the product as I please in the privacy of my home, as I do with my motorcycle and with my bottle of shampoo and with my books excerpts from which I, gasp, copy into notebooks, letters and posts on FR, and a kid in a country, whose name you can't even pronounce, will sooner or later defeat your clever protection scheme and, guess what, give his code away!
19 posted on 01/10/2002 6:11:53 PM PST by Revolting cat!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Lurker
The fact that reading the contents of a disk you purchased isn't illegal.

Uh, sorry, you're wrong. The Digital Millenium Copyright Act (DMCA) clearly states that you're not allowed to reverse-engineer technological measures intended to protect digital works. Trying to break encryption/copy protection schemes is quite different from fair use. Mostly because its primary intent is theft of copyrighted information. If you buy a DVD, you are licensing the content. You do not own the content.

Also noteworthy is the fact that the indicted person isn't alleged to have made one single dime from his creation.

Irrelevant.

He just wanted to be able to play DVDs on a UNIX platform, so he wrote a program to do just that.

Uh, no, he did far more than that: He distributed DeCSS at the expense of copyright holders. In other words, his actions promoted theft of copyrighted data.

He didn't 'steal' anything. If you want to put him into prison because he invented something that could be used to steal, I guess you'll want the guy who invented the crowbar imprisoned next.

Yes, he did steal. He removed copy protection which he was not entitled to do under law.

If they caught this guy pirating DVDs for profit, I would agree with you. But, they didn't.

Do you realize how many people this kid enabled to do exactly that?!? Wake up. Welcome to reality. Actions have consequences. If he truly only wanted to backup his DVDs, he wouldn't have distributed his program. Sorry, not buying your lame-ass story.

Indicting this guy for theft makes about as much sense as indicting Sam Colt for inventing the revolver because people commit crimes with guns.

Wrong. The law is clear on this issue. He's going down.
20 posted on 01/10/2002 6:29:39 PM PST by Bush2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson