Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Bypasses Senate on 2 More Nominees
New York Times ^ | Saturday, January 12, 2002 | CHRISTOPHER MARQUIS

Posted on 01/12/2002 5:35:07 AM PST by JohnHuang2

January 12, 2002

Bush Bypasses Senate on 2 More Nominees

By CHRISTOPHER MARQUIS

WASHINGTON, Jan. 11 — Seeking to end a months-long stalemate, President Bush used a backdoor procedure to appoint two nominees to high-ranking positions in the State and Labor Departments today after they had failed to win Senate approval.

Over the objections of some Senate Democrats, Mr. Bush appointed Otto J. Reich as assistant secretary of state for Western Hemisphere affairs and Eugene Scalia as Labor Department solicitor.

The president's action could complicate his relations with the Senate, where Senator Tom Daschle, who is the majority leader, and a handful of other top Democrats adamantly objected to the nominations.

Mr. Bush filled the positions under a procedure known as a recess appointment. The Constitution authorizes the president to fill vacant positions when the Senate is in recess, as it is now. The appointees may serve without confirmation until the end of the Congressional session at the end of the year; a majority of senators can remove them at any time.

A White House spokeswoman, Anne Womack, said today that Senate Democrats had forced the president's hand by refusing to grant a confirmation hearing to Mr. Reich and blocking a full Senate vote for Mr. Scalia, whose nomination was approved in committee.

"Both nominations have been sitting in the Senate for months," Ms. Womack said. "They're both critical nominations for this administration. By failing to act, the Senate gave the president no other option but to exercise his Constitutional right to appoint them by recess appointment."

Mr. Daschle issued a statement calling Mr. Bush's action "regrettable."

He said that the nomination of Mr. Scalia, who is the son of Justice Antonin Scalia of the Supreme Court, eventually would have come up for a vote by the full Senate. White House officials disputed that today.

"We also said it appeared that Mr. Scalia's record of hostility toward worker protections would have made his confirmation unlikely," Mr. Daschle said.

Turning to the status of Mr. Reich, he added: "Senators on both sides of the aisle had also raised questions about Mr. Reich's nomination based on his record, both in government and in the private sector."

Mr. Reich's nomination to become the top American diplomat for the Western Hemisphere drew strong opposition from a group of senators led by Senator Christopher J. Dodd, a Connecticut Democrat who is chairman of the foreign relations subcommittee on Latin America. The standoff threatened to revive the fractious debates over Central America policy between Congress and the Reagan White House two decades ago.

In the mid-1980's, Mr. Reich led a covert program to generate public support in the United States for the anti-Sandinista rebels, or contras, in Nicaragua. As the Iran-contra affair became known, a government investigation concluded that Mr. Reich's office had engaged in prohibited acts of domestic propaganda. Mr. Reich's defenders have denounced the inquiry as flawed and note that no charges were filed against him.

Mr. Reich went on to serve as ambassador to Venezuela. More recently, he has worked as a consultant and lobbyist for companies with a variety of interests in Latin America. Mr. Reich, who was born in Cuba, has also been an outspoken critic of President Fidel Castro.

Senator Dodd raised concerns that Mr. Reich's business ties and political agenda left him unqualified for the post and with a "a tin ear when it comes to ethical considerations."

Mr. Dodd suggested that Mr. Reich's appointment could jeopardize the administration's efforts to forge a bipartisan approach to regional issues of free trade, drug- trafficking and immigration.

But supporters of Mr. Reich said his knowledge of Latin America and the Washington bureaucracy made him amply qualified to handle a region that Mr. Bush has declared a foreign policy priority. His appointment was greeted with special enthusiasm by Cuban-Americans, an important constituency for the Bush administration.

Mr. Scalia, who will occupy the Labor Department's third highest position and serve as the secretary's legal adviser, found himself in the cross hairs of organized labor because of his opposition to some worker protection initiatives.

He once denounced as "quackery" and "junk science" a Clinton administration regulation on ergonomics designed to reduce injuries due to repetitive motion; the Bush administration repealed it in March.

John J. Sweeney, the president of the A.F.L.-C.I.O., called Mr. Scalia's appointment "a slap in the face of American workers."

Senator Edward M. Kennedy, the Massachusetts Democrat who heads the committee on labor, said he regretted the president's move.

As the department's solicitor, Mr. Scalia, a Washington lawyer, will oversee about 180 laws affecting safety and health in the workplace, workers' compensation, minimum wage guarantees and job training.



TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last
To: mombonn
And buried under Enron, which is much ado about nothing (until one gets to the Clintons, that is), which is a desperation play by the Democrats that is going to backfire.

Did you see he pulled $34 million of money from aid to China for population control efforts (read: forced abortions)? The legislation passed set a maximum dollar amount but not a minimum, and Bush said "I appreciate the flexibility they put into the legislation" and put the whole amount on hold? lol

21 posted on 01/12/2002 7:01:00 AM PST by Hugh Akston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Seeking to end a months-long stalemate, President Bush used a backdoor procedure to appoint two nominees to high-ranking positions in the State and Labor Departments today after they had failed to win Senate approval.

What's in bold is the bald-faced lie in this article, of course. Neither Scalia nor Reich failed to win Senate approval. Neither had an opportunity to get Senate approval because the Senate wouldn't schedule a vote.

All it seems that the NYT is doing right now is removing the letterhead from the DNC press releases. Makes it a lot easier, I s'pose.

22 posted on 01/12/2002 7:15:56 AM PST by Mark de New Brighton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks
Add Chris Dodd to the list.

You have to admit it's pretty funny to see Chris Dodd questioning the ethics of ANYBODY else. Especially when you consider his Senator father was paying him 20+ grand per year for a "no-show" job while he was in college.

23 posted on 01/12/2002 8:52:57 AM PST by sneakypete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: randita
Scalia was politically incorrect on the "repetitive motion stress" article of faith required by the democrats' union bosses. This was to be the vehicle for unionization of workers with computers, an area where unions have had no success organizing. Extensive studies have shown it to be nonsense, yet the unions had hoped to have the government lend some credence to the matter.
24 posted on 01/12/2002 10:57:27 AM PST by thucydides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: veronica
I think Bush is engaging in strategic calculation when he acts nice towards Kennedy. It plays well to undecideds to see him "reaching out", it's still pretty disgusting to watch though.
25 posted on 01/12/2002 11:06:29 AM PST by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Brett66
It got buried in the next to last and back page of the L.A Slimes here. The front page led with a slam by the paper's liberal political analyst Ronald Brownstein of how damaging the Enron (he conveniently omitted mention that the Rats hands are even deeper in the mess) non-affair is to the Bush Administration's image by citing how it shows the President's closeness to corporate and energy interests at the expense of the little guy. It must frustrate the liberal media the recess appointments angle bombed so they're hoping against hope that somehow may be Enron will stick. That's what Brownstein is hoping will happen. So if any one thinks the press's animus towards this Preident disappeared with Sept. 11th better think again. They're just getting started and will stop at nothing to help the Rats bring him down.
26 posted on 01/12/2002 11:16:38 AM PST by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-26 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson