Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AdrianZ
I think the judge should have based his decision on the fact that the ex-wife was trying to take the kid to live that far away from the father, without invoking the supposed "dangers" of living in Israel.

The father (and the court) may have valid reasons to suspect his wife's motives and plans. From the news story, it seems that the last time the ex-wife took the kid out of the country she was only supposed to go for a month, but then kept the child away from the father for 14 months. Plenty of American parents have completely lost contact with their kids when the other parent took them off to some foreign country and the American courts lost jurisdiction. Maybe Mr. Korn has good reason to fear that will happen with his daughter.

A two year old needs regular contact with BOTH parents. I don't know why the ex-wife in this case feels she has to move to Israel, but I think that for the child's welfare she should probably defer her move, at least until the child is a lot older.

7 posted on 02/02/2002 1:41:46 PM PST by ikurrina
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ikurrina
bump
8 posted on 02/02/2002 3:25:05 PM PST by homeschool mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: ikurrina
Are either of the parents US citizens? I don't think so. In fact, I think they are both Israeli. If my assertion is true, then the judge is totally out of line.
9 posted on 02/02/2002 3:39:18 PM PST by rebdov
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson