Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who here has served on jury duty and has a good excuse to get off?
me ^ | Feb. 6, 2002 | me

Posted on 02/06/2002 5:48:13 PM PST by Nachum

The county of Los Angeles refused to accept the excuses I put down. As in the days of the military draft, I have been called into service. Worse yet, the judge won't let me off after I explained my financial duress in a possible two week criminal trial. Now we come to JURY SELECTOION. I have to think of a good line to tell the prosecuting and defense attorney to convice them that I would be a poor choice to sit on their jury.

So- I am asking my fellow FReepers if they have had similar experience and can give guidance, a good retort, or tactic. I am counting on you!


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 341-351 next last
To: Nachum
I doubt if you can use my excuse. I was called for jury duty, went to the commissioner just prior to the jury assembling. I asked her who were the individuals in the case, which she then told me. I then told her I couldn't serve, my boss is the defense attorney in the case. She said, well, we'll just have to wait for the judge to dismiss you, then, I can't. I sat through the video pep talk about what an honor it is to serve as a juror, etc., and at its conclusion, we all stood up to get in line to go to the court room. The commissioner came over to me, tapped me on my shoulder and said, "the judge said you're dismissed from jury duty."
161 posted on 02/06/2002 7:17:40 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Sometimes I have wanted to be on a jury, sometimes not. It depends on whether the case looks interesting, and the estimated length of the trial.

If I don't want to be on the jury......during the interview process I ask a question of one of the attorneys which clearly implies that I am against his client.

Works every time.

162 posted on 02/06/2002 7:18:14 PM PST by Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
I wouldn't want you on a jury if I was on trial.

If you're ever on trial, you deserve twelve of your own kind!

163 posted on 02/06/2002 7:19:40 PM PST by lonestar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
"The cops arrested him, right? He must be guilty."
164 posted on 02/06/2002 7:22:26 PM PST by brewcrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
P.S., the judge commented that he thought my boss quite clever for "somehow getting me in the jury pool."
165 posted on 02/06/2002 7:23:56 PM PST by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
If I am not mistaken, LA County has just switched to "one day or one trial" jury service. That's the way it is here in Orange County. It's really pretty painless.
166 posted on 02/06/2002 7:24:53 PM PST by Sandshark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
I was called for jury duty, but didn't make it past the selection process. It was a child abuse case where the 7 year old boy was hospitalized with a ruptured spleen. The defendant, the mother's boyfriend, had been previously convicted of abusing the same kid. I was eliminated from consideration because I told them that the prior conviction would influence my opinion.
167 posted on 02/06/2002 7:28:29 PM PST by knuthom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Show up and when asked about partiality, say "Hang the guilty bastard!"
168 posted on 02/06/2002 7:30:24 PM PST by ImpBill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sandshark
It would be except for the judge we have.
169 posted on 02/06/2002 7:30:29 PM PST by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Tell the court you listen to Rush Limbaugh regularly, it works like a charm!!!!!
170 posted on 02/06/2002 7:31:48 PM PST by al's a risky scheme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Oh no! Ito!?!
171 posted on 02/06/2002 7:34:55 PM PST by Sandshark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

Comment #172 Removed by Moderator

To: Nachum;snopercod;JeanS;riley1992;yazd;TomGuy;joanie-f;mommadooo3;brityank
Observations.

First, the defendant's attorney asked the jury pool, Who has bumper stickers on their car? All hands raised, were dismissed from duty.

Second, I have this innate dislike of police officers who lie; the slightest whiff of a lie, and / or sign of a police officer who does not respect the Constitution and the principle of limited government, which is to say, the limits of an officer's authority ... and I will consider such an officer as lower than all, because the abuse of police powers is tyranny.

Third, because of the deplorable presentation by the state's prosecutor, who was more sure of his theatrical abilities than the facts, on several of the criminal charges, we found the defendant Not Guilty --- much to the disgust of the judge (who, by the way, could have cared less that a police officer would lie).

Fourth, among the evidence supposedly against the defendant, were one item and one incident which proved that a particular detective / investigator on the police force had not only lied, but forged portions of a document introduced as evidence.

Fifth, a veteran police officer, with considerable wisdom (it really was smooth), neatly worked his way through the minefield of stating precisely what he knew, in very specific terms, without any editorializing ... and thereby avoided the attempts of the prosecutor to insinuate the officer's experience with the defendant, into the op-ed which was the so-called "evidence" produced by the aforementioned, obviously lying detective.

Well, the creep, ie. "the perp," we found Guilty on enough of the many charges, to put him away for 15 years without parole.

But the judge made a remark to the newspapers after the trial, to the effect of, he would not want the jury members back in his court again.

Thereby, did I manage to be permanently "disbarred" from practicing "jury nullification" before the courts around here.

:-)

173 posted on 02/06/2002 7:37:39 PM PST by First_Salute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #174 Removed by Moderator

To: Nachum
Just jump up and scream like a lunatic "HE'S GUILTY !!!!".
175 posted on 02/06/2002 7:40:37 PM PST by ColdSteelTalon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #176 Removed by Moderator

To: Nachum
Always remember that Prosecutors and Defense Attorney's want morons as jurors as they are much easier to manipulate.

---max

177 posted on 02/06/2002 7:42:40 PM PST by max61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #178 Removed by Moderator

To: jackbill
The juror - my employee - waited a long time for a pay raise.

How nice. Your employee -- who almost certainly knew more about the case, the defendant and the victim, than you did -- exercised his conscience. And you punished him for it.

I'm glad you're not my boss -- and you should be glad your employee doesn't know that was your motivation. It could be construed as jury tampering.

179 posted on 02/06/2002 7:45:42 PM PST by Brandon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Tell them you can't serve, because you would miss the Rush Limbaugh show. It that doesn't work, ask them if you have to check your weapons at the door.
180 posted on 02/06/2002 7:47:35 PM PST by jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 341-351 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson