[goodell70]

Thank you for replying. This was the very point. The "evidence" of the airplane going into the water was so scant -- speaking of the expected quantity of corpses and baggage, not to mention the fuselage itself -- that it suggested "mischief." In other words, the evidence that the airplane went into the water turned out to be fairly conclusive evidence that it actually never did go into the water. I really recommend following the series of articles on this that were published in The New American. It's on line. This is just a tiny part of a massive flood of deception and dishonesty that Americans have been and are still being subjected to.

[Redcloak]

So little washed ashore at Hokkaido because it is so far from the crash site. The debris seemed quite consistent with what one would expect given that much water between point A and point B. Also, I find it a little hard to believe that Ronaldus Magnus was engaged in a pro-Soviet cover-up.