TWA Flight 800 - "CAN YOU BELIEVE THIS IS A LIE? I CAN'T"

Accuracy In Media ^ | Reed Irvine

[Rokke]

Exactly which of your arguements would you like refuted again? Perhaps you can give me an example of "pablum" which doesn't factually refute some of the brilliant analysis you've asked me to read. I've tried to give you web addresses for any information I've provided. If you'd like a different source let me know, and I'll find one.

[Rokke]

"MY point exactly! If rogue forces had launched an attack, ATC, POTUS, would be informed"

But your assumption is only valid if there was a missile of any catagory. The fact that there was no response can just as easily be used as proof that there was nothing to generate a response.

[Rokke]

With regard to the Cummock issue...The commission Cummock sat on dealt with airline security. Appropriating Federal funding to improve airline security was a direct benefit to the airline industry. I can understand why the airline industry would want to climb into bed with the feds on that issue. Since the finding of the NTSB in the TWA 800 incident was actually harmful to TWA (much more so than if it had been a missile) I doubt TWA went out of its way to support a cover-up that contributed significantly to its eventual demise. I can't understand why they would support a cover-up that cost them millions.

[Rokke]

"I was kidding you when I asked for a quick critique."

From your tone in those series of posts it didn't appear you were kidding. By the way, your last several messages stand in stark contrast. They are cogent, coherent, lack CAPs and insults, and seem to be a sincere effort at discussing the issues at hand. Is someone else using your computer?

"You apparently had no explanation why the boxes appeared so different.(one with handle, one missing data plate etc)"

I'm not sure what you are referring to. I didn't see any mention of that in the article you provided.

[_Jim]

Well, now someone has talked.

Was the flight TWA800 aircraft a low-hour airframe or a high-hour airframe?