Posted on 03/04/2002 7:33:31 PM PST by NormsRevenge
ARIEL SHARON was fighting more than just a military campaign yesterday against Palestinian gunmen, who inflicted terrible casualties on Israeli troops and civilians over the weekend.
For the first time since he came to office a year ago, the Israeli Prime Minister was also battling for political survival, as his public support collapsed and he struggled to bridge growing splits within his polarised coalition Government.
Mr Sharon provokes extreme reactions from his countrymen, who admire and loathe him in equal measure. But on one point most Israelis, until recently at least, could agree: the former general is seen as a good man in a crisis, who is not afraid to use Israel’s considerable military force to protect the Jewish State.
While abroad he may be remembered for his disastrous invasion of Lebanon in 1982, in Israel many recall his exploits as a young paratroop officer who led a ruthless unit that operated against Palestinians in the 1950s. He was also credited with saving Israel during the 1973 Yom Kippur War through his tactical genius in the Sinai campaign.
Above all, when he came to power a year ago, he made clear that he would not follow Ehud Barak, his predecessor, in chasing a peace agreement with the Palestinians until the country’s security was fully restored.
Twelve months on that pledge is in tatters. The conflict has deteriorated rapidly since Mr Sharon came to power and now hardly a week goes by without Israel suffering fresh casualties from an opponent growing ever more daring and deadly.
This weekend, 21 Israelis were killed in a bloody 24 hours. The response from the Israeli Right was to call for the removal of Yassir Arafat, the Palestinian leader, and the destruction of his Palestinian Authority, the skeletal, barely functioning administration that has taken the brunt of Israeli retaliatory raids.
Danny Naveh, a minister in the ruling Likud Party, spoke for many when he urged Mr Sharon to use “more force and more force — as much force as we have”. Others would like to see the Israeli Army disarm the thousands of Palestinian gunmen. Extremists advocate the forced removal of Palestinians from the West Bank and Gaza.
On the Left, however, there is a growing sense that peace and security can be achieved only through dialogue. As Ephraim Sneh, a former general and now the Transport Minister, said: “In the end there has to be a diplomatic solution. Without one, this land will know another 100 years of war.”
Amid the strongly conflicting advice within his national unity Government, Mr Sharon has opted to do very little. He has advocated building a costly buffer zone to keep Palestinians out of Jerusalem, but the plan is probably unworkable and, in any event, most of the fighting now seems to be targeted at Jewish settlers and Israeli troops in the occupied territories.
Meanwhile his popularity has plunged to less than 50 per cent for the first time, as the casualty toll rises and Israel’s once-buoyant economy slides deeper into recession. Sensing his vulnerability, his rivals within the party are planning to challenge his leadership.
Mr Sharon’s options are unenviable. He could try a bold military action, but his troops are demoralised and growing numbers are refusing to serve in the occupied territories. So far heavy-handed tactics have failed to intimidate the Palestinians and instead have provoked worse attacks.
Today Mr Sharon looks like a tired heavyweight fighter past his prime and waiting for the towel to be thrown into the ring.
Netanyahu will challenge Sharon very soon for leadership.
In fact, I had thought that Sharon would have had more cahones than this, and would have sent in the troops and already taken the West Bank and Gaza Strip. Something must be holding him back. Methinks that that something has red-white-and-blue because of the war on terrorism.
Also on the Left, is a growing sense that the earth is flat.
In the long run however, the Jihadies are going to have to be killed off. You can't reason with them, and they leave him no alternative.
Also, there is no point in talking with Yassir, because he either cannot or will not control the radicals and that makes him either impotent or part of the problem anyway. If he could be effective you would think 30+ years woudl be enough time, not to mention destroying the Jew's was part of the PLO charter anyway.
And screw the Saudi's. Land for peace didn't work for the Checks and it's not going to work for Sharon. They will play nice, take the land, come up with an excuse for the peace to break down and then return to square one.
At that point he will have neither the peace or the land.
Perhaps Sharon (or Israeli citizens) should consider what this man had said. Sharon's aggresive position, his bravado and his obstinacy have accomplished nothing. All this while almost two thousand persons have been slaughtered. Hatred on both sides for the other has increased while Palestinian martyrdom has reached epic proportions. It is time he gave it up or perhaps that he be replaced.
Darn right. Sharon is a great man. Am reading his auto-biography right now. Was published in 1989.
On the Left, however, there is a growing sense that peace and security can be achieved only through dialogue. As Ephraim Sneh, a former general and now the Transport Minister, said: “In the end there has to be a diplomatic solution. Without one, this land will know another 100 years of war.”
Sure! Withdraw from all of the West Bank/Gaza per Pallie demands. This will be sure to bring peace! Jihadist Muslims are men of honor, will be happy with such a grand gesture, and will be sure to reciprocate. <Sarcasm>
Also on the Left, is a growing sense that the earth is flat.
Also on the left, is the liberal media fabricating this "growing sense..."
are they gonna "wimp out like the politically-correct yanks?"...
or are they gonna "nuke em..."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.