http://messages.iwon.com/jsp/topicview.jsp?tid=97931&va=8
Forcing others to "tremble at our approch" IS a form of weakness. It's like the bully at school that is constantly beating up smaller kids. That bully goes home and his Dad probably beats him and the rest of his siblings. So, instead of standing up to his father (the actual problem) he masks his feelings and compensates for his shortcomings by making those smaller than him feel inferior. That kid later grows up to kill his son's hockey coach, because rather than be the bigger man, he chose the easy "strike fear" attitude towards problem solving. Well, who's the tough guy now?
We, as a nation, could show the world how civilized society deals with it troubles. We could show our country is so strong that it will take a lot more than a few religous zealots living in caves to topple democracy. We have an opportunity to show the rest of the world the the United States is a mature culture, that does not need to resort to violence to get our points across, and is willing to listen rather than blindly assuming that it's Arabs against Americans.
Instead, we have stepped down to the level of our enemy. We have spent the last six months bombing an innocent country for the crimes of a very small number of its citizens. Osama bin Laden attacked a country for the crimes of a very small number of its people. How do our actions make us strong, while bin Laden's actions make him evil?
One more thing. The Taliban used to hold public executions as a tactic for keeping their people in line. Using fear to control is a fundimental part of terrorism and despotism. If we are to use even the threat of nuclear retaliation to make our enemies "tremble with fear", then how are we at all better than terrorists themselves?
____________________________________
Yes, innocent.
We were attacked by an organization called "Al-Queda" headed by a religous zealot named Osama bin Laden. Instead of hunting down and capturing these criminals in a proper fashion, we bombed Afghanistan, a country that, for the most part, is not populated by terrorists.
Osama bin Laden believes that we, and the western civilization in general, are evil and to blame for the poor living conditions and injustices commited on his people. He attacked our country because he feels, however miguided, he is right to attack our country. Basically, he has attacked our entire population for the crimes of a very small percentage of it. So how do we respond...
BY ATTACKING HIS ENTIRE COUNTRY FOR THE CRIMES OF A SMALL FEW!!!
So please, cut and paste boy, justify our hypocrisy. Convince me that obliterating our problems is just as good as solving them. Show me that our actions, however similar, are somehow more rightous than bin Laden. How did it come to pass that we are the ultimate "good guy", completely without blame or guilt?
______________________________________
http://messages.iwon.com/jsp/topicview.jsp?tid=95351&va=1
You can't fight a war against terrorism for the same reason you can't a war against murder. War invariably leads to terrorism, and murder is murder no matter how you slice it. The only way to "beat terrorism" is to make America a place that people don't want to terrorize. Otherwise, it will by an eye for an eye for an eye until there aren't anymore eyes left. Then we'll just have a bunch of blind terrorists mad at blind Americans for making them blind. The rage builds and the cycle starts all over again.
________________________________________________
Ask yourself why this faction of people saw fit to attack us. Was it because they want to dismantle democrocy? Was it because they want to rule the world? Was it because God told them to?
No. It was because they feel, however misguided their feelings are, that are being oppressed by Americans and the western civilization in general. They feel that it is our fault that they live in poor, bombed out shantytowns. They feel that we are denying them medical goods, and keep their prices high. They have no food, little water and less education and are looking for someone to blame. They feel that they have to wage war, not only to destroy us, but to save themselves. In a sense, they are fighting for the same things we are: freedom.
I would never say that the people that commited the attacks of Sept. 11th should not be punished. Of course they should. But can you honestly believe that carpet bombing a country that isn't quite ready to hand over one of its citizens to a secret military tribunal is going to help the issue?
The World Trade Center was brought down by people looking to punish a country for the crimes of a very small percentage of its citizenry. How do we respond? By bombing a country for the crimes of a small percentage of its citizenry. A tad bit hypocritcal, wouldn't you say?
Here's a thought: What happens after the war in Afghanistan ends? Will we stay and help them to their feet? Will we help them rebuild and fortify their country? Or will we bail on them again like we did whe the Soviet Union was repelled? And who did we leave in charge: the Taliban. And who did we train to fight the Soviets while we were fighting the contrived evils of Communism? Osama bin Laden. We need to take a good look at ourselves! We need to stop finding scapegoats for our probelms and start solving things! This American "Poor Me, what did I ever do" bullshit needs to end and its time to grow up as a society. If we want to stop terrorism, then we need to be bigger than the terrorists. Because if we keep using violence to solve our problems, then the cycle continues, and the terrorists will have won.