Dems Promote Voter Fraud

Newsmax.com ^ | March 8, 2002 | Michael Savage

[StarFan]

We have voter fraud running rampant in America. The other day I went into my local polling booth, gave them my name – old ladies, all liberals of course, from the League of Women Voters, to make sure Republican ballots are treated unfairly.

In fact, they said one to the other, "How is he registered?" They didn't know who I was, and one whispered to the other, "Republican," and the other looked at me with glaring alarm, as if an alien had walked into the voting booth.

Here in Taliban County, not far from Rat Boy's high school, if anyone says he is Republican, I am surprised that they don't call the police, release attack dogs and turn on the fire hoses!

I pulled out my driver's license and I said, "Would you like to see my ID?" The old gray lady with tennis sneakers said, "OH, NO."

I said, "What do you mean, "Oh, no"? How do you know I am who I am? I am trying to defend the voting system."

"Oh, no," she said.

Ladies and gentlemen, in America today we have lost that which your ancestors died for – our sacred right to vote. If you offer your photo ID and have it refused, you will be considered to be committing a hate crime.

In the upside down, Alice-in-Wonderland world ruled by psychotic liberals, voter fraud is now considered a civil right. And if you try to prevent voter fraud, it is now considered a hate crime. The liberals have destroyed our voting system, and I can prove it to you right now and I am going to name names.

I will give you the names of two public enemies with regard to reforming election fraud.

Right now there's a Republican bill in the Senate that would require a photo ID for anyone who wants to vote. Now, we know that photo IDs can be faked, but we know that it is much better than just a signature.

Take a guess which two U.S. senators are trying to block the use of photo IDs for voters. None other than Chuck "Upchuck" Schumer in New York, the ambulance chaser, the man with no shame, the man who looks like he just got out of a courtroom after settling a chain accident for illegal immigrants.

And on the West Coast, Ron Wyden of Oregon is trying to block fixing the voting system. Now, you have to ask yourself why. Why would Wyden widen cheating on votes?

Why would a radical liberal like Ron Wyden – who is tied to Enron's auditor, Arthur Anderson, by the way – widen cheating on votes? What is in it for the radical liberals? Well, the answer is so simple.

I will read you what Wyden has to say. He said, "The 2000 ballot recount in Florida taught us that the goal of election reform should be to simplify the system and make it more inclusive. The narrow photo ID requirement of the election reform bill could effectively straitjacket voters, not just in Oregon, but across the country. That's why I have offered the amendment to allow more flexibility."

Now, the key word here is "inclusive," which is a code word for illegal alien and those not entitled to vote. And the phrase "narrow photo ID requirement" is another giveaway that he is trying to permit illegal aliens to vote, in my not-so-humble opinion.

Ron Wyden and "Upchuck" Schumer should be censured by the United States Senate for blocking voter reform.

For so many years we have screamed, "Stop the illegal votes! Stop the illegals from voting! Stop the vote scam!" And now we know who is protecting the vote scammers: Ron Wyden and Upchuck Schumer.

How you liberals, who claim to love liberty, can vote for these two, I don't know. Wyden wants it to be more "inclusive"? Does that include the Arabs who come here to kill us? Is that what he wants? Does he want to give those who want to bomb us the right to vote with fake IDs? What kind of inclusion do you mean, Mr. Wyden?

I want you to read another thing that Wyden has to say: "The goal of this Amendment is to make certain that overly stringent identification requirements ..." Now, wait a minute, how can you have "overly stringent" identification requirements?

Ron Wyden says, "The goal of this Amendment is to make certain that overly stringent identification requirements do not disenfranchise eligible voters or compromise Oregon and Washington's unique mail ballot systems." Want to take a guess which national organizations oppose the photo ID requirements?

* The League of Women Voters in the U.S., a radical front group * The Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, a radical front group * The American Association of Retired Persons, a radical pressure group * The National Hispanic Leadership Agenda, a radical socialist group * The National Council of La Raza, a racist group * The Mexican-American Legal Defense and Education Fund, an anti-American racist group * The NAACP Legal Defense Fund, an anti-white pressure group

In my opinion, each of the above wants to maintain voter fraud. They do not want your vote to remain sacred. They want to make certain that those not eligible to vote can continue to skew elections and put in power rats and skunks of the type we have now.

What do you do if you wake up one day and find out your country has been stolen from you? You go on the radio and say it like it is and let the chips fall where they may.

I am going to tell you how your parents voted. I am going to tell you exactly what the situation was when your parents voted in this country. And you will learn that identification for voting in America today is still on the honor system.

In a time of total corruption, in a time of war, in a time where we are riddled with 10-15 million illegal aliens, these left-wing radicals still say we need this honor system. Signatures, if taken, are not compared to your signature on file in most places, unless you are challenged by election judges or poll watchers, which rarely happens. Of course, it might happen if you are a white male and a registered Republican.

When the system started hundreds of years ago, as you well know, the election judges and poll watchers in your town knew most everyone in their precincts. In modern America, this is uncommon. Ladies and gentlemen of the United States of America, your voting system is totally bankrupt. Voter fraud is totally out of control.

The Republicans answering the call of the American citizen have tried to put in a sensible photo ID requirement. The radical left-wing harpies are trying to block even this. They are traitors and should be investigated by the Senate. I only wish we had a Sen. McCarthy to uncover their true loyalty.

[StarFan]

A letter to my Senator, The Honorable Chuck upchuck Schumer will be sent ASAP!

[StarFan]

Ping

[ReaganIsRight]

This is only four-five days old. Where have you been, it's as old as Hillary?

[lilylangtree]

That's real interesting. I'm in Washington State, east of the Cascades. I've taken time off from work to be one of those judges at the voting table. There should be 3 people at the table representing a precinct--one republican, one democrat and one independent. On the smaller elections, it's hard to recruit the three. I don't know if this procedure applies to all states. My concern is that we have new computerized voting machines, and voting privacy is a real issue because there isn't any. Our county rid itself of the chad system since it didn't want to have another "Florida" situation.

[StarFan]

This is only four-five days old. Where have you been, it's as old as Hillary? It could be 10 days old for all I care -- it hasn't been posted and I thought it should be!

There should be 3 people at the table representing a precinct--one republican, one democrat and one independent. Interesting that an Independent must be present. In my county in NY we must have two republicans and two democrats at each table.

[Chu Gary]

I recently spent two months in Costa Rica and figured that they probably had similar, or worse, problems as compared to the "advanced" state of U.S. politics. Well, Cerveza breath, not true!! Voting is an option, not a requirement. When you arrive to vote, you go not to a general voting booth, but to a building (typically a schoolhouse) which is divided, by room, into about 40 different voting rooms. You enter the room for your alphabetical order, state your name and they look you up in a booklet which includes your picture. Once they decide you are who you claim to be, you can vote. After voting, you proffer your ballot; before it is accepted, you're required to affix your thumbprint, THEN they accept it. The Dim-ocrats should start worrying!!

[ReaganIsRight]

It was posted, everything from Newsmax is always posted about as soon as it is available.

[StarFan]

IF it was posted, it didn't appear on the search I performed. Do you have a link?

[ReaganIsRight]

The search engine is labeled as EXPERIMENTAL, may not work.

Believe me, if it hits Newsmax it's here PDQ.

[denydenydeny]

No, this article has never been posted before, at least under this title.

[Snuffington]

* The League of Women Voters in the U.S., a radical front group * The Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, a radical front group * The American Association of Retired Persons, a radical pressure group * The National Hispanic Leadership Agenda, a radical socialist group * The National Council of La Raza, a racist group * The Mexican-American Legal Defense and Education Fund, an anti-American racist group * The NAACP Legal Defense Fund, an anti-white pressure group

This is terrific! If only all conservative commentators and reporters had the courage to label these groups for what they are - which is all this seemingly incindiary language is doing. Next time you hear Pat Buchanan called a right wing extremist, whether you agree with that assessment or not, ask yourself why the above groups aren't labelled as they are above - which would be nothing less than quid pro quo.

[Consort]

Voter fraud; scaring seniors; class worfare; turning young against old, race against race, gender against gender, etc; belittling marriage, attacking Boy Scouts, flags, patriotism and religion,.... The Democrats can not win without these tactics.

[rdb3]

A letter to my Senator, The Honorable Chuck upchuck Schumer will be sent ASAP!

I'm with you in spirit. Don't know how much good it'll do, though.

[Snuffington]

Incidentally, for those of you worried about motor-voter registration and the like, here in Minnesota people can register at the polls on election day. What's more, in order to register, you need no ID whatsoever. You simply need a registered voter to "vouch" that you are a legal voter in that precinct.

Motor voter is a timid step compared to the great leap of voter fraud the liberals have planned for the nation.

[Bob J]

I think this is an issue the FRN should put on the front burner. My suggestion is to request that Diotima put it on the agenda for discussion at the next Leadership Council meeting.

[StarFan]

PING. I agree that CFR is a priority but we cannot allow this issue to be placed on the back burner. If not nipped in the bud, our efforts to gain control of both houses will be for naught.

[ladyinred]

I have spent the past months since the last general election writing, faxing and emailing the California state legislatures demanding reform at the polls to prevent fraud.
All I have ever been told is that the democrats who are in the majority will never allow photo ID's to become a requirement because it might intimidate someone.
They can't explain how the simple act of showing proof of citizenship and/or identity could intimidate anyone who is a legal voter.
Certainly I know the real reason they are opposed to it. They know that their party benefits from the illegal voting practices that run rampant in California.
Savage is right on in this article!

[nightdriver]

We have similar people manning the pols here in Washington. I got quite a reaction from them when I was done voting as I said rather loudly, "Like the democRATs always say, 'vote early, vote often.'" There was a stony silence with about half of them staring at the floor.

[fire_eye]

Take a guess which two U.S. senators are trying to block the use of photo IDs for voters. None other than Chuck "Upchuck" Schumer in New York, the ambulance chaser, the man with no shame, the man who looks like he just got out of a courtroom after settling a chain accident for illegal immigrants.

WAIDaminnit...
Didn't Scummer just publish a socialist rant in the Spew Yuck Times a few weeks back (or was it the Wall Street Journal)? saying that we needed a national ID card in order to stop terrorism??

So what's the deal, Chuckie... ? We need a national ID card, but not for voting?

< < FORMAT ERROR... > > Does not compute...

[KLT]

Gee, I'm shocked, appalled and so horrified....I never dreamed the demonrats would do such a thing..(off sarcasm)