Skip to comments.
Dems Promote Voter Fraud
Newsmax.com ^
| March 8, 2002
| Michael Savage
Posted on 03/12/2002 4:57:28 PM PST by StarFan
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
A letter to my Senator, The Honorable Chuck upchuck Schumer will be sent ASAP!
1
posted on
03/12/2002 4:57:28 PM PST
by
StarFan
To: firebrand, Oschisms, hellinahandcart, KLT, dutchy, OneidaM, Ken5050, foreshadowed at waco, dbwz,
Ping
2
posted on
03/12/2002 4:59:02 PM PST
by
StarFan
To: StarFan
This is only four-five days old. Where have you been, it's as old as Hillary?
To: StarFan
That's real interesting. I'm in Washington State, east of the Cascades. I've taken time off from work to be one of those judges at the voting table. There should be 3 people at the table representing a precinct--one republican, one democrat and one independent. On the smaller elections, it's hard to recruit the three. I don't know if this procedure applies to all states. My concern is that we have new computerized voting machines, and voting privacy is a real issue because there isn't any. Our county rid itself of the chad system since it didn't want to have another "Florida" situation.
To: ReaganIsRight, lilylangtree
This is only four-five days old. Where have you been, it's as old as Hillary? It could be 10 days old for all I care -- it hasn't been posted and I thought it should be!
There should be 3 people at the table representing a precinct--one republican, one democrat and one independent. Interesting that an Independent must be present. In my county in NY we must have two republicans and two democrats at each table.
5
posted on
03/12/2002 5:19:43 PM PST
by
StarFan
To: StarFan
I recently spent two months in Costa Rica and figured that they probably had similar, or worse, problems as compared to the "advanced" state of U.S. politics. Well, Cerveza breath, not true!! Voting is an option, not a requirement. When you arrive to vote, you go not to a general voting booth, but to a building (typically a schoolhouse) which is divided, by room, into about 40 different voting rooms. You enter the room for your alphabetical order, state your name and they look you up in a booklet which includes your picture. Once they decide you are who you claim to be, you can vote. After voting, you proffer your ballot; before it is accepted, you're required to affix your thumbprint, THEN they accept it. The Dim-ocrats should start worrying!!
6
posted on
03/12/2002 6:17:55 PM PST
by
Chu Gary
To: StarFan
It was posted, everything from Newsmax is always posted about as soon as it is available.
To: ReaganIsRight
IF it was posted, it didn't appear on the search I performed. Do you have a link?
8
posted on
03/12/2002 6:44:43 PM PST
by
StarFan
To: StarFan
The search engine is labeled as EXPERIMENTAL, may not work.
Believe me, if it hits Newsmax it's here PDQ.
To: ReaganIsRight; *Vote fraud
No, this article has never been posted before, at least under this title.
To: StarFan
* The League of Women Voters in the U.S., a radical front group * The Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, a radical front group * The American Association of Retired Persons, a radical pressure group * The National Hispanic Leadership Agenda, a radical socialist group * The National Council of La Raza, a racist group * The Mexican-American Legal Defense and Education Fund, an anti-American racist group * The NAACP Legal Defense Fund, an anti-white pressure group This is terrific! If only all conservative commentators and reporters had the courage to label these groups for what they are - which is all this seemingly incindiary language is doing. Next time you hear Pat Buchanan called a right wing extremist, whether you agree with that assessment or not, ask yourself why the above groups aren't labelled as they are above - which would be nothing less than quid pro quo.
To: StarFan
Voter fraud; scaring seniors; class worfare; turning young against old, race against race, gender against gender, etc; belittling marriage, attacking Boy Scouts, flags, patriotism and religion,.... The Democrats can not win without these tactics.
12
posted on
03/12/2002 7:16:25 PM PST
by
Consort
To: StarFan
A letter to my Senator, The Honorable Chuck upchuck Schumer will be sent ASAP!
I'm with you in spirit. Don't know how much good it'll do, though.
13
posted on
03/12/2002 7:17:39 PM PST
by
rdb3
To: StarFan
Incidentally, for those of you worried about motor-voter registration and the like, here in Minnesota people can register at the polls on election day. What's more, in order to register, you need no ID whatsoever. You simply need a registered voter to "vouch" that you are a legal voter in that precinct.
Motor voter is a timid step compared to the great leap of voter fraud the liberals have planned for the nation.
To: StarFan
I think this is an issue the FRN should put on the front burner. My suggestion is to request that Diotima put it on the agenda for discussion at the next Leadership Council meeting.
15
posted on
03/12/2002 7:23:12 PM PST
by
Bob J
To: diotima
PING. I agree that CFR is a priority but we cannot allow this issue to be placed on the back burner. If not nipped in the bud, our efforts to gain control of both houses will be for naught.
16
posted on
03/12/2002 8:11:52 PM PST
by
StarFan
To: StarFan
I have spent the past months since the last general election writing, faxing and emailing the California state legislatures demanding reform at the polls to prevent fraud.
All I have ever been told is that the democrats who are in the majority will never allow photo ID's to become a requirement because it might intimidate someone.
They can't explain how the simple act of showing proof of citizenship and/or identity could intimidate anyone who is a legal voter.
Certainly I know the real reason they are opposed to it. They know that their party benefits from the illegal voting practices that run rampant in California.
Savage is right on in this article!
To: StarFan
We have similar people manning the pols here in Washington. I got quite a reaction from them when I was done voting as I said rather loudly, "Like the democRATs always say, 'vote early, vote often.'" There was a stony silence with about half of them staring at the floor.
To: StarFan
Take a guess which two U.S. senators are trying to block the use of photo IDs for voters. None other than Chuck "Upchuck" Schumer in New York, the ambulance chaser, the man with no shame, the man who looks like he just got out of a courtroom after settling a chain accident for illegal immigrants. WAIDaminnit...
Didn't Scummer just publish a socialist rant in the Spew Yuck Times a few weeks back (or was it the Wall Street Journal)? saying that we needed a national ID card in order to stop terrorism??
So what's the deal, Chuckie... ? We need a national ID card, but not for voting?
< < FORMAT ERROR... > > Does not compute...
19
posted on
03/12/2002 8:40:03 PM PST
by
fire_eye
To: StarFan
Gee, I'm shocked, appalled and so horrified....I never dreamed the demonrats would do such a thing..(off sarcasm)
20
posted on
03/12/2002 9:52:57 PM PST
by
KLT
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson