Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dems Promote Voter Fraud
Newsmax.com ^ | March 8, 2002 | Michael Savage

Posted on 03/12/2002 4:57:28 PM PST by StarFan

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last
A letter to my Senator, The Honorable Chuck upchuck Schumer will be sent ASAP!
1 posted on 03/12/2002 4:57:28 PM PST by StarFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: firebrand, Oschisms, hellinahandcart, KLT, dutchy, OneidaM, Ken5050, foreshadowed at waco, dbwz,
Ping
2 posted on 03/12/2002 4:59:02 PM PST by StarFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StarFan
This is only four-five days old. Where have you been, it's as old as Hillary?
3 posted on 03/12/2002 5:11:35 PM PST by ReaganIsRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StarFan
That's real interesting. I'm in Washington State, east of the Cascades. I've taken time off from work to be one of those judges at the voting table. There should be 3 people at the table representing a precinct--one republican, one democrat and one independent. On the smaller elections, it's hard to recruit the three. I don't know if this procedure applies to all states. My concern is that we have new computerized voting machines, and voting privacy is a real issue because there isn't any. Our county rid itself of the chad system since it didn't want to have another "Florida" situation.
4 posted on 03/12/2002 5:12:17 PM PST by lilylangtree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReaganIsRight, lilylangtree
This is only four-five days old. Where have you been, it's as old as Hillary? It could be 10 days old for all I care -- it hasn't been posted and I thought it should be!

There should be 3 people at the table representing a precinct--one republican, one democrat and one independent. Interesting that an Independent must be present. In my county in NY we must have two republicans and two democrats at each table.

5 posted on 03/12/2002 5:19:43 PM PST by StarFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: StarFan
I recently spent two months in Costa Rica and figured that they probably had similar, or worse, problems as compared to the "advanced" state of U.S. politics. Well, Cerveza breath, not true!! Voting is an option, not a requirement. When you arrive to vote, you go not to a general voting booth, but to a building (typically a schoolhouse) which is divided, by room, into about 40 different voting rooms. You enter the room for your alphabetical order, state your name and they look you up in a booklet which includes your picture. Once they decide you are who you claim to be, you can vote. After voting, you proffer your ballot; before it is accepted, you're required to affix your thumbprint, THEN they accept it. The Dim-ocrats should start worrying!!
6 posted on 03/12/2002 6:17:55 PM PST by Chu Gary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StarFan
It was posted, everything from Newsmax is always posted about as soon as it is available.
7 posted on 03/12/2002 6:43:00 PM PST by ReaganIsRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ReaganIsRight
IF it was posted, it didn't appear on the search I performed. Do you have a link?
8 posted on 03/12/2002 6:44:43 PM PST by StarFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: StarFan
The search engine is labeled as EXPERIMENTAL, may not work.

Believe me, if it hits Newsmax it's here PDQ.

9 posted on 03/12/2002 6:59:28 PM PST by ReaganIsRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ReaganIsRight; *Vote fraud
No, this article has never been posted before, at least under this title.
10 posted on 03/12/2002 7:07:25 PM PST by denydenydeny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: StarFan
* The League of Women Voters in the U.S., a radical front group * The Leadership Conference on Civil Rights, a radical front group * The American Association of Retired Persons, a radical pressure group * The National Hispanic Leadership Agenda, a radical socialist group * The National Council of La Raza, a racist group * The Mexican-American Legal Defense and Education Fund, an anti-American racist group * The NAACP Legal Defense Fund, an anti-white pressure group

This is terrific! If only all conservative commentators and reporters had the courage to label these groups for what they are - which is all this seemingly incindiary language is doing. Next time you hear Pat Buchanan called a right wing extremist, whether you agree with that assessment or not, ask yourself why the above groups aren't labelled as they are above - which would be nothing less than quid pro quo.

11 posted on 03/12/2002 7:15:25 PM PST by Snuffington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StarFan
Voter fraud; scaring seniors; class worfare; turning young against old, race against race, gender against gender, etc; belittling marriage, attacking Boy Scouts, flags, patriotism and religion,.... The Democrats can not win without these tactics.
12 posted on 03/12/2002 7:16:25 PM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StarFan
A letter to my Senator, The Honorable Chuck upchuck Schumer will be sent ASAP!

I'm with you in spirit. Don't know how much good it'll do, though.

13 posted on 03/12/2002 7:17:39 PM PST by rdb3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StarFan
Incidentally, for those of you worried about motor-voter registration and the like, here in Minnesota people can register at the polls on election day. What's more, in order to register, you need no ID whatsoever. You simply need a registered voter to "vouch" that you are a legal voter in that precinct.

Motor voter is a timid step compared to the great leap of voter fraud the liberals have planned for the nation.

14 posted on 03/12/2002 7:19:12 PM PST by Snuffington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StarFan
I think this is an issue the FRN should put on the front burner. My suggestion is to request that Diotima put it on the agenda for discussion at the next Leadership Council meeting.
15 posted on 03/12/2002 7:23:12 PM PST by Bob J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: diotima
PING. I agree that CFR is a priority but we cannot allow this issue to be placed on the back burner. If not nipped in the bud, our efforts to gain control of both houses will be for naught.
16 posted on 03/12/2002 8:11:52 PM PST by StarFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: StarFan
I have spent the past months since the last general election writing, faxing and emailing the California state legislatures demanding reform at the polls to prevent fraud.
All I have ever been told is that the democrats who are in the majority will never allow photo ID's to become a requirement because it might intimidate someone.
They can't explain how the simple act of showing proof of citizenship and/or identity could intimidate anyone who is a legal voter.
Certainly I know the real reason they are opposed to it. They know that their party benefits from the illegal voting practices that run rampant in California.
Savage is right on in this article!
17 posted on 03/12/2002 8:21:52 PM PST by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StarFan
We have similar people manning the pols here in Washington. I got quite a reaction from them when I was done voting as I said rather loudly, "Like the democRATs always say, 'vote early, vote often.'" There was a stony silence with about half of them staring at the floor.
18 posted on 03/12/2002 8:22:25 PM PST by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StarFan
Take a guess which two U.S. senators are trying to block the use of photo IDs for voters. None other than Chuck "Upchuck" Schumer in New York, the ambulance chaser, the man with no shame, the man who looks like he just got out of a courtroom after settling a chain accident for illegal immigrants.

WAIDaminnit...
Didn't Scummer just publish a socialist rant in the Spew Yuck Times a few weeks back (or was it the Wall Street Journal)? saying that we needed a national ID card in order to stop terrorism??

So what's the deal, Chuckie... ? We need a national ID card, but not for voting?

< < FORMAT ERROR... > > Does not compute...

19 posted on 03/12/2002 8:40:03 PM PST by fire_eye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StarFan
Gee, I'm shocked, appalled and so horrified....I never dreamed the demonrats would do such a thing..(off sarcasm)
20 posted on 03/12/2002 9:52:57 PM PST by KLT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson