Now what caused the blood in the Van Dam's house?
Did anyone actually testify to blood in or around the van Dams house, or was that just the defense attorney? What about the finger prints in the RV? Danielle was alive in there? How long? Was she alive in there at 9:30 the following morning, when DW left for the beach? While a full scale investigation was going on?
Why just one or two Danielle prints in the RV? Were others wipped off by DW?
Why take a blood stained jacket to the cleaners? He had two days. Why not get rid of it?
Why not clean the porn pictures from your hard drive? DW does not act like a murderer trying to cover up.
Can someone just become a child rapist and killer at age 50? Wouldn't there be something leading up to it, some other crimes? Can anyone piece together what the prosecution theory of this case is? It doesn't seem to make much sense.
Now what caused the blood in the Van Dam's house?
Well, how about this thought.......
Brenda and kids visited DW, and sold Girl Scout cookies. Did the kids "run" around the inside of DW's house? That's the story.
If the RV was there, kid's would have loved a "tour". Like going to an amusement park. The Palm/Hand print was on a cabinet, above the bed. You mean like how kid's jump on beds, like a trampoline? (Thinking inside and outside of the box!)
I think the important question is whether they found blood, or traces of blood at the van Dam's.
I saw a piece on 20/20 (I think) last night about a woman's dissappearance that was solved years after the case had gone cold. Forensic techs were able to spray a room with some substance that showed, under a blacklight, if any blood had ever come in contact with room surfaces.
I have kids, and from the spontaneous nose bleeds, to cuts and scrapes from playing outside, there are probably traces of their blood on more than a few places in my house.