Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EBUCK;ez;sinkspur
Check out posts #319 and #320.
And I'll add to those posts that there's only a small amount of people involved (200,000) and it expires in October. (thanks, sinkspur)
334 posted on 03/13/2002 5:43:17 PM PST by dixiechick2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies ]


To: dixiechick2000
I saw him on H:C as well. He said that he wouldn't support amnesty. He lied. He did support amnesty.

I must admit tho, it isn't as bad as I thought, it's not "blanket" amnesty, it's only "blanket" amnesty if you have even the slightest ability to forge. So I guess plausable deniablity is still intact.

I read both h.r. 1885 and 245(i) and I still say that this is amnesty. 245(i) starts out with tough talk about must have this and that to qualify, but almost immediatly runs into the if they don't have that, this will do, or if thats not available and so on and on and.....

EBUCK

763 posted on 03/14/2002 8:38:22 AM PST by EBUCK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 334 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson